Critics decry GM rule in Iraq | The Scientist Magazine®
News Magazine Multimedia Subjects Surveys Careers
Sign In or Register
The Scientist » News & Opinion » News Analysis Critics decry GM rule in Iraq They argue policy allowing transgenic wheat could wipe out natural varieties in the place where wheat was born By Anne Harding([email protected]
) | November 30, 2005
Follow The Scientist
Recent rule changes allowing farmers to use transgenic wheat species in Iraq to help rebuild the region's agriculture have some critics concerned that the new policy could help wipe out the natural hotbed of diversity in Iraq, where wheat originated.
"Introducing transgenic wheat means replacing this diversity and leaving it to extinction," warned Nagib Nassar, a professor of genetics at the Universidade de Brasilia. "It will be replaced by a monoculture with a very narrow genetic base. This is a problem. This will be a catastrophe."
What's gotten people worried is Order 81, one of 100 orders enacted by Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) Administrator L. Paul Bremer. Issued in 2004, Order 81 authorizes the introduction of GM crops as part of an effort to restore the nation's agricultural base, and gives intellectual property rights
to the developers of new seed varieties.
This isn't the first time Iraqi farmers have been exposed to genetic modification. For thousands of years, Iraqi farmers have saved seed from each year's crops, replanting and crosspollinating varieties for higher yields, better pest resistance, and other beneficial traits. But Order 81 makes it illegal for Iraqi farmers to reuse seeds from any crops planted using a patented seed variety. Farmers who chose to use patented varieties would have to buy new seed every year.
Critics such as the nongovernmental organizations GRAIN and Focus on the Global South
say US agribusiness pushed for Order 81 in hopes of turning Iraqi farmers into cash crop producers. They fear a Green Revolutionstyle overhaul of Iraq's ancient agricultural practices, with trademarked crop varieties requiring plenty of fertilizer and pesticide muscling out loweryielding, but more dependable, traditional varieties.
But officials on the ground in Iraq say such worries are overblown. "I don't think there is any substantial information behind it," Tekeste Tekie, officer in charge in Iraq for the United Nations
' Food and Agriculture
Organization, told The Scientist. "I don't think there is anybody trying to push genetically modified crops onto Iraqis."
The FAO recently secured funding for a $5.4 million project to help restore Iraq's seed industry, nearly destroyed by the war. The project, developed jointly by Iraqi scientists and the FAO, will include training of scientists and farmers, as well as restoration of seed laboratories and seed multiplication centers. It is slated to begin in 2006. Despite ongoing violence in parts of the country, Tekie noted, 14 of 18 Iraqi governates are safe.
Iraq remains in dire need of assistance to rebuild its agricultural capacity. While 5 million acres of wheat were under cultivation in Iraq in 2003 before the US invasion, only 1 million are being grown today, Sanjaya Rajaram, director of integrated gene management at the International Center for Agricultural Resources (ICARDA) in Aleppo, Syria, told The Scientist. And during that time, yields have dwindled from two tons per hectare to a halfton. Iraqi farmers are currently only able to cover 4% of the country's demand for high quality seed.
Given the current state of Iraq's agricultural system, however, some experts say the country is just not ready for GM crops. Any introduction of genetically modified wheat into the region would have to be done with extreme caution, after careful study, and Iraq simply does not have the necessary infrastructure to make this possible, Michael Larindi, a seed production officer at FAO, told The Scientist.
More immediate threats to Iraq's wheat heritage include the danger that Iraqi farmers will toss out their old seed in favor of new varieties, or that areas where wild wheat grows will be paved over or otherwise developed, said Marilyn Warburton, a molecular biologist at the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center in Mexico City, better known by its Spanish acronym, CIMMYT.
The solution, Warburton said, is to set aside protected land where the wild varieties can grow, and to ensure seeds of old varieties are safely banked. While Iraq's ancient seed stores have been decimated, the Consultative Group
on International agricultural research
is holding some Iraqi seeds in gene banks in Syria and Mexico City.
Stay Connected with The Scientist The Scientist Magazine The Scientist Careers Neuroscience Research techniques
Genetic Research Techniques Cell Culture Techniques Microbiology and Immunology Cancer research
and Technology stem cell
and Regenerative Science Popular Posts 1. Imaging Intercourse, 1493 2. StemCell Scientist Dies 3. Nanomedicine 4. CRISPR Corrects Blood Disorder Gene 5. The Body's Ecosystem Current Issue
View the August 2014 contents.
WHO Declares Ebola Emergency By Tracy Vence As the World Health Organization
Modified CRISPR Expands Targets By Kerry Grens Tweaking the expression of guide
How Bulgy Bears Keep Diabetes at Bay By Jyoti Madhusoodanan A genetic switch in hibernating bears
Subscribe to RSS feed All The Nutshell News & Opinion Careers
Critics decry GM rule in Iraq | The Scientist Magazine®
calls the ongoing Ebola outbreak in West Africa
an international public health emergency, the US Food and Drug Administration greenlights the potential use of another experimental drug.
RNAs used in CRISPR genome editing broadens the repertoire of target sites.
keeps the animals from becoming insulinresistant.
Job Listings Subscribe Archive Now Part of the LabX Media Group: Lab Manager Magazine | LabX | LabWrench
© 19862014 The Scientist
T Vence, K Grens, J Madhusoodanan