Barley, Oat and Rye

Tags: oat varieties, test weight, barley varieties, L White, North Dakota, North Dakota State University, Med, South Dakota State University, University of Saskatchewan, University of Minnesota, MS MS MR CDC Meredith M Canada, Montana State University, NA S MR Sunshine F Germany NA R L White, North Central Research Extension Center, Carrington Research Extension Center, malting barley, Research Extension Center, Hettinger Research Extension Center, R L White, NA MS NA Harrington8 F Canada
Content: AA11004499-1-616
North Dakota Barley, Oat and Rye Variety Trial Results for 2016 and Selection Guide
Joel Ransom, Robert Brueggeman, Rich Horsley, Mike McMullen, Paul Schwarz and Andrew Friskop (NDSU Main Station); Blaine Schatz, Steve Zwinger and Mike Ostlie (Carrington Research Extension Center); Glenn Martin (Dickinson Research Extension Center); John Rickertsen (Hettinger Research Extension Center); Eric Eriksmoen (North Central Research Extension Center, Minot); Bryan Hanson (Langdon Research Extension Center); and Gautam Pradhan (Williston Research Extension Center) Barley, oat and rye varieties currently grown in North Dakota are described in the following tables. Successful production of these crops depends on numerous factors, including selecting the right variety for a particular area. Characteristics to evaluate in selecting a variety are: yield potential in your area, test weight, straw strength, plant height, reaction to problematic diseases and maturity. Selecting varieties with good quality also is important to maintain market recognition. Because malting barley usually is purchased on an identity-preserved basis, producers are encouraged to determine which barley varieties are being purchased by potential barley buyers before selecting a variety. When selecting a high-yielding and good-quality variety, use data that summarize several years and locations. Additional data from county sites are available at www.ag.ndsu.edu/varietytrials/ and from each Research Extension Center. The agronomic data presented in this publication are from replicated research plots using experimental designs that enable the use of statistical analysis. The LSD (least significant difference) numbers beneath the columns in tables are derived from these statistical analyses and apply only to the numbers in the column in which they appear. Differences between two varieties exceeding the LSD value means that with 95 or 90 percent confidence (LSD probability 0.05 or 0.10), the higher-yielding variety has a significant yield advantage. The abbreviation NS is used to indicate that no statistical difference occurs between varieties. The CV is a measure of variability in the trial. The CV stands for coefficient of Variation and is expressed as a percentage. Large CVs mean a large amount of variation could not be attributed to differences in the varieties. Presentation of data for the entries tested does not imply approval or endorsement by the authors or agencies conducting the test. North Dakota State University approves the reproduction of any table in this publication only if no portion is deleted, if appropriate footnotes are given and if the order of the data is not rearranged.
List of Tables
Table 1. Table 2. Table 3. Table 4. Table 5. Table 6. Table 7. Table 8. Table 9. Table 10.
2016 North Dakota barley variety descriptions. Yield and test weight of barley varieties at two locations in eastern North Dakota, 2014-2016. Plump and protein of barley varieties at two locations in eastern North Dakota, 2016. Yield and test weight of barley varieties at four locations in western North Dakota, 2014-2016. Plump and protein of barley varieties at four locations in western North Dakota, 2016. 2016 North Dakota oat variety descriptions. Yield and test weight of oat varieties at three locations in eastern North Dakota, 2014-2016. Yield and test weight of oat varieties at four locations in western North Dakota, 2014-2016. 2016 North Dakota winter rye variety descriptions. Yield and test weight of winter rye varieties at three locations in North Dakota, 2014-2016.
Fargo, North Dakota
November 2016
1
Table 1. 2016 North Dakota barley variety descriptions.
Variety
Rachilla Year Awn Hair Aleurone Use1 Origin2 Released Type 3 Length4 Color
Height
Straw Strength
Relative Maturity
Stem Rust
Reaction to Disease5 Spot-form Spot Net Net Blotch Blotch Blotch
Six-rowed
Celebration M/F BARI
2008
S
S
White M.short Strg.
Med.
S
MS
MR/R MS/S
Drummond M/F ND
2000
S
L
White M.short V.strg.
Med.
S
MR
MR/R MS/S
Innovation
MT BARI
2009
S
L
White M.short Strg.
Med.
S
MS
MR/R MS/S
Lacey
M/F MN
1999
S
S
White M.short Strg.
Med.
S
MR
MR/R MS/S
Legacy
M/F BARI
2000
S
L
White Med. Strg.
M.late S
MS
MR/R MS/S
Quest6
M/F MN
2010
S
L
White M.short V.strg.
Med.
S
MR
MR/R MS/S
Rasmusson M/F MN
2008
S
S
White M.short Strg.
Med.
S
MS
MR/R MS/S
Robust
F
MN
1983
S
S
White Med. M.strg. Med.
S
MS/S MR/R MS/S
Stellar-ND
M/F ND
2005
S
L
White M.short V.strg.
Med.
S
MS
MR/R MS/S
Tradition
M/F BARI
2003
S
L
White M.short V.strg.
Med.
S
MS
MR/R MS/S
Two-rowed
AAC Synergy M/F Syngenta 2015
R
L
White M.short Strg.
M.late MR MR/R
MR MR
ABI Balster M/F BARI
2015
R
L
White M.short Med.
Med. NA
MR
NA NA
ABI Growler M/F BARI
2015
R
L
White M.short M.strg. Med. NA MS/S
NA NA
AC Metcalfe M Canada 1997
R
L
White Med. Med.
Late
S
MS
MS
S
CDC Copeland M Canada 1999
R
L
White Tall Med.
Late
S
MS
MS MR
CDC Meredith M Canada 2008
R
L
White Med. Med.
Late MR
MR
S
MS
Conlon7
M/F ND
1996
S
L
White M.short Med. M.early S
MR
MS MR/R
Conrad
M BARI
2007
R
L
White Tall M.weak Late
S
MS
NA NA
Eslick
F
MT
2003
R
L
White Med. M.weak M.late S
NA
MS NA
Harrington8
F Canada 1981
R
L
White Med. M.weak Late
S
S
S
MS
Haxby
F
MT
2003
R
L
White Med. Med.
Med.
S
MS
MS NA
Hockett
M/F MT
2008
R
L
White Med. Med.
Med.
S
NA
NA NA
LCS Genie
M Limagrain NA
S
S
White Short V.strg. Med. NA
MS
NA NA
LCS Odyssey M/F Limagrain NA
R
S
White Short Med.
Med. NA
MS
NA NA
Lilly
F Germany NA
R
L
White Short M.strg. Late
S
MS/S
S MR/R
ND Genesis9 M/F ND
2015
S
L
White Med. M.strg. M.late S
MR
MR MS
Pinnacle
M/F ND
2006
S
L
White Med. Strg.
M.late S
S
MR MS
Rawson
F
ND
2005
R
L
White Med. Med.
Med.
S
MS
MR MS
Scarlett
M Germany 1995
R
L
White Short Med.
Late
S
NA
S
MR
Sunshine
F Germany NA
R
L
White Short M.strg. Late
S
S
S
MS
Specialty
Wanubet
SP MT
1990
H
L
White Med. Weak
Late
S
NA
S
S
1 M = malting; MT = being tested in plant-scale tests for malting and brewing quality; F = feed; SP = special uses (hull-less).
2 BARI = Busch Agricultural resources Inc.; MN = University of Minnesota; MT = Montana State University; ND = North Dakota State University.
3 R = rough; S = smooth; H = hull-less.
4 S = short; L = long.
5 R = resistant; MR = moderately resistant; MS = moderately susceptible; S = susceptible; NA = not available.
6 Moderately resistant to Fusarium head blight.
7 Lower DON accumulations than other varieties tested.
8 Recommended as a malting barley in western U.S.
2
Table 2. Yield and test weight of barley varieties at two locations in eastern North Dakota, 2014-2016.
Carrington
Langdon
Average Eastern N.D.
Variety
Test
Yield
Test
Yield
Test
Yield
Wt.
2016
3 Yr.
Wt.
2016
3 Yr.
Wt.
2016
3 Yr.
Six-rowed Celebration Innovation Lacey Quest Stellar-ND Tradition Two-rowed AAC Synergy ABI Balster ABI Growler CDC Meredith Conlon LCS Genie LCS Odyssey ND Genesis Pinnacle Rawson SY Sirish Mean CV % LSD 0.05 LSD 0.10
(lb/bu) 46.2 46.7 47.1 47.1 46.1 47.8 47.1 46.2 45.5 44.1 50.2 47.8 47.7 48.4 47.4 48.4 48.7 47.7 1.7 1.2 1.0
-----(bu/a)-----
57.1
95.5
54.8
91.8
56.6
90.6
48.1
86.6
54.8
89.6
49.2
88.2
48.7
--
55.8
--
52.2
--
51.1
--
52.8
91.1
51.9
--
53.1
--
55.6
90.3
55.7
91.5
53.0
89.2
53.2
--
52.6
90.5
10.8
--
NS
--
NS
--
(lb/bu) 47.1 46.3 46.9 45.9 48.8 46.8 48.0 43.7 45.4 44.7 49.7 43.5 39.9 47.3 47.9 46.8 44.1 46.4 2.6 1.7 1.4
-----(bu/a)-----
110.5 112.9 115.9 107.2 104.0 108.1
128.1 126.3 126.0 120.2 119.3 124.1
112.5 91.8 94.4 90.3 76.4 77.2 70.8 104.6 105.8 106.6 87.5 100.3 6.4 9.1 7.6
----104.4 --119.2 125.3 117.5 -121.2 ----
(lb/bu) 46.7 46.5 47.0 46.5 47.5 47.3 47.6 45.0 45.5 44.4 50.0 45.7 43.8 47.9 47.7 47.6 46.4 47.1 3.8 3.7 3.1
-----(bu/a)-----
83.8
111.8
83.9
109.1
86.3
108.3
77.7
103.4
79.4
104.5
78.7
106.2
80.6
--
73.8
--
73.3
--
70.7
--
64.6
97.8
64.6
--
62.0
--
80.1
104.8
80.8
108.4
79.8
103.4
70.4
--
76.5
103.6
13.1
--
NS
--
NS
--
Table 3. Plump and protein of barley varieties at two locations in eastern North Dakota, 2016.
Carrington
Langdon
Variety Six-rowed Celebration Innovation Lacey Quest Stellar-ND Tradition Two-rowed AAC Synergy ABI Balster ABI Growler CDC Meredith Conlon LCS Genie LCS Odyssey ND Genesis Pinnacle Rawson SY Sirish Mean CV % LSD 0.05 LSD 0.10
Plump (%) 88.0 86.3 82.5 80.5 86.4 83.5 88.9 83.5 88.2 75.1 97.6 92.2 92.3 92.5 92.8 97.0 93.7 89.7 5.0 6.3 5.3
Protein (%) 16.3 16.4 15.8 16.0 14.9 15.8 15.4 16.2 16.6 15.7 14.9 15.9 15.6 14.2 14.7 13.9 15.6 15.3 4.4 0.9 0.8
Plump (%) 92.3 91.0 90.7 85.0 95.5 88.7 94.3 83.7 83.9 85.8 96.1 82.9 82.0 96.2 96.1 96.9 85.0 90.8 4.2 5.4 4.5
Protein (%) 13.9 13.5 13.9 13.0 13.3 13.9 11.9 12.8 12.4 12.2 12.7 12.4 12.0 10.9 12.5 12.2 13.0 12.5 5.3 0.9 0.8
Average Eastern N.D.
Plump (%)
Protein (%)
90.2
15.1
88.7
15.0
86.6
14.9
82.8
14.5
91.0
14.1
86.1
14.9
91.6
13.7
83.6
14.5
86.1
14.5
80.5
14.0
96.9
13.8
87.6
14.2
87.2
13.8
94.4
12.6
94.5
13.6
97.0
13.1
89.4
14.3
89.1
14.1
5.1
3.9
9.6
1.2
8.0
1.0
3
Table 4. Yield and test weight of barley varieties at four locations in western North Dakota, 2014-2016.
Dickinson
Hettinger
Minot
Williston
Test
Yield
Test
Yield
Test
Yield
Test
Yield
Variety
Wt. 2016 3 Yr. Wt. 2016 3 Yr. Wt. 2016 3 Yr. Wt. 2016 3 Yr. (lb/bu) ---(bu/a)--- (lb/bu) ---(bu/a)--- (lb/bu) ---(bu/a)--- (lb/bu) ---(bu/a)---
Six-rowed
Celebration
49.1 74.3 100.2 43.3 61.4 84.4 49.2 92.4 91.1 48.6 87.1 68.1
Innovation
50.8 77.8 103.8 44.4 62.1 90.5 50.5 94.0 90.3 47.4 73.9 61.5
Lacey
50.6 75.2 106.4 45.4 59.5 86.0 51.1 84.8 88.3 48.6 77.6 63.7
Quest
49.9 74.5 99.8 43.7 64.4 80.3 49.8 101.1 91.8 49.2 76.7 66.6
Stellar-ND
49.3 75.2 108.5 44.0 62.5 90.4 48.9 96.0 89.7 47.8 66.6 58.5
Tradition
51.1 69.5 97.2 46.5 63.3 89.1 50.3 89.0 83.4 48.6 77.9 68.0
Two-rowed
AAC Synergy 50.9 90.3 --
44.7 75.7
--
50.2 114.5 --
48.9 81.8 --
ABI Balster
49.9 92.4 --
43.9 73.2
--
50.0 108.6 --
47.1 76.3 --
ABI Growler
49.1 86.9 --
43.4 68.0
--
49.7 103.8 --
49.2 75.2 --
CDC Meredith 49.5 94.9 --
41.9 68.2
--
49.2 110.2 --
48.3 82.1 --
Conlon
51.5 54.2 88.1 46.5 60.4 87.1 52.1 93.5 94.1 49.5 71.4 61.9
LCS Genie
51.0 97.1 --
45.9 67.0
--
50.6 107.5 --
50.3 81.9 --
LCS Odyssey 50.4 92.7 --
43.2 70.7
--
49.7 126.1 --
49.5 75.9 --
ND Genesis
50.8 88.7 113.2 45.8 69.0 95.5 50.5 110.4 106.7 49.8 77.1 62.8
Pinnacle
52.5 80.3 112.3 47.8 64.6 94.4 51.7 104.7 92.9 50.6 83.3 71.8
Rawson
51.4 73.9 106.3 45.8 66.1 87.1 50.6 95.8 94.0 50.8 83.0 66.7
SY Sirish
51.9 91.4 --
45.8 71.4
--
50.9 118.4
49.9 78.1 --
Mean
50.6 81.7 103.6 44.8 66.3 88.5 50.3 103.0 92.2 49.1 78.0 65.0
CV %
0.9 9.2 --
1.5
7.5
--
1.0
7.4
--
1.7 6.6 --
LSD 0.05
0.7 10.6 --
1.0
7.2
--
0.8 12.7
--
1.2 7.4 --
LSD 0.10
0.6 8.8 --
0.8
6.0
--
0.7 10.6
--
1.0 6.2 --
Average Western N.D.
Test
Yield
Wt. 2016 3 Yr. (lb/bu) ---(bu/a)---
47.6 78.8 86.0 48.3 77.0 86.5 48.9 74.3 86.1 48.2 79.2 84.6 47.5 75.1 86.8 49.1 74.9 84.4 48.7 90.6 -47.7 87.6 -47.9 83.5 -47.2 88.9 -49.9 69.9 82.8 49.5 88.4 -48.2 91.4 -49.2 86.3 94.6 50.7 83.2 92.9 49.7 79.7 88.5 49.6 89.8 -48.7 82.3 87.3 1.4 7.7 -1.0 9.0 -0.8 7.5 --
Table 5. Plump and protein of barley varieties at four locations in western North Dakota, 2016.
Dickinson
Hettinger
Minot
Williston
Average Western N.D.
Variety
Plump Protein
Plump Protein Plump Protein Plump Protein Plump
Protein
--------------------------------------------------------------------(%)----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Six-rowed
Celebration
98.3
15.2
89
13.4
95
13.9
75.8
15.6
89.5
14.5
Innovation
99.3
14.5
90
12.6
98
13.1
73.3
16.4
90.2
14.2
Lacey Quest
99.0
14.8
98.5
14.2
90
13.0
96
13.0
73.9
15.9
89.7
14.2
86
13.5
92
13.5
76.3
16.1
88.2
14.3
Stellar-ND
98.6
14.1
89
13.1
96
12.9
67.0
17.3
87.7
14.4
Tradition
99.1
15.6
93
12.6
95
13.0
66.7
15.7
88.5
14.2
Two-Rowed
AAC Synergy
98.8
13.6
94
12.1
97
12.7
76.9
15.1
91.7
13.4
ABI Balster
97.4
13.9
89
11.8
95
12.7
52.8
17.2
83.6
13.9
ABI Growler
97.3
14.6
88
12.6
95
13.5
74.8
16.7
88.8
14.4
CDC Meredith
97.3
13.4
85
11.9
95
12.1
66.5
15.7
86.0
13.3
Conlon LCS Genie
98.9
14.5
98.6
13.2
98
13.0
98
13.3
89.5
16.0
96.1
14.2
93
12.6
96
12.4
73.7
15.6
90.3
13.5
LCS Odyssey
99.1
12.4
93
10.9
97
11.9
79.3
15.9
92.1
12.8
ND Genesis
99.0
13.2
97
11.9
98
11.3
91.4
14.2
96.4
12.7
Pinnacle
99.1
13.9
96
11.4
98
10.9
88.5
13.8
95.4
12.5
Rawson SY Sirish
99.2
13.6
99.1
12.8
96
12.6
97
12.7
92.9
14.0
96.3
13.2
92
11.3
97
13.0
71.0
16.1
89.8
13.3
Mean
98.6
14.0
92
12.4
96
12.7
75.9
15.7
90.6
13.7
CV %
0.3
5.5
2.6
4.3
0.9
3.8
8.7
4.4
5.3
4.5
LSD 0.05 LSD 0.10
0.5
1.6
3.4
0.7
1
0.8
9.3
1.0
6.9
0.9
0.4
1.3
2.9
0.6
1
0.7
7.8
0.8
5.7
0.7
4
Table 6. 2016 North Dakota oat variety descriptions.
Reaction to Diseases
Variety AAC Justice AC Assiniboia AC Kaufman AC Pinnacle Beach Buff CDC Dancer CDC Minstrel CDC Weaver Deon Furlong Goliath Hayden HiFi Horsepower Hytest Jury Killdeer Leggett Loyal Maida Morton Newburg
Origin1 AAFC/MN AAFC AAFC AAFC ND SD Sask. Sask. Sask. MN AAFC SD SD ND SD SD ND ND AAFC SD ND ND ND
Year Released 2015 1997 2000 1999 2004 2002 2000 2006 2005 2013 2003 2013 2015 2001 2012 1986 2012 2000 2005 2000 2005 2001 2011
Grain Color White Red Yellow White White Hull-less White White Yellow Yellow Red White White White White White White White White Ivory Yellow White White
Height Tall Med. Tall Tall Tall Med. Tall Tall Med. Tall Tall Tall Med Tall Short Tall Tall Med. Tall Tall Med. Tall Tall
Straw Strength Strong Strong Strong Med. M.strg. M.strg. Strong M.strg. M.strg. Strong M.strg. Med. Med Strong Strong M.strg. M.strg. Strong Strong M.strg. Strong V.strg. Med.
Stem
Maturity2 Rust3
L
S
L
S
L
S
L
S
M/L
S
L
S
L
S
L
S
L
S
L
S
L
S
L
NA
M
S
L
MR/MS
E/M
MS
E
S
M
R
M
S
L
MR
L
S
M
R
L
S
L
R
Crown Rust3 R S S S MR/MS MR/MS MS S S R S MR/MS MR/MS S S MS S MS R MR S S S
Barley Y.Dwf4 NA T MT S MS MT S S S T T NA MT T MT S MT MT S T MS MT MT
Bu/Wt. Good Good V.good V.good V.good Good V.good Good Good V.good V.good Good V Good Good V.good V.good V.good Good Good Good V.good V.good Good
Protein5 NA M/L M/L L M H M M M M M M M M/H H M M M M/H M/H M M
Otana
MT
1977
White M.tall M.weak
L
S
S
S
V.good M/L
Paul
ND
1994 Hull-less V.tall Strong
L
R
MR/MS
T
Good
H
Rockford
ND
2008
White
Tall
Strong
L
S
S
MT
V.good
M
Sesqui
MN
2001
Yellow M.tall Strong
L
S
S
T
Good
M
Shelby 427
SD
2008
White Med. Strong
E
S
S
NA
V.good
NA
Souris
ND
2006
White Med. Strong
M
MS
S
MS
V.good
M
Stallion
SD
2006
White
Tall
Med.
L
S
MR
NA
V.good
M
Stark
ND
2004 Hull-less Tall
M.strg.
L
R
MR/MS
T
V.good
M
Streaker
SD
2008 Hull-less Tall M.weak
M
S
R/MR
NA
V.good M/H
Summit
AAFC
2008
White Med. Strong
L
S
S
MT
Good
M
1 AAFC = Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada; MN = University of Minnesota; ND = North Dakota State University; SD = South Dakota State University;
Sask. = University of Saskatchewan; MT = Montana State University. 2E = early; M = medium; L = late. 3R = resistant; MR = moderately resistant; MS = moderately susceptible; NA = not available; S = susceptible. 4Barley Yellow Dwarf Virus; S = susceptible; MS = moderately susceptible; MT = moderately tolerant; T = tolerant; NA = not available.
Varieties rated MT or T have a relatively good degree of protection against barley yellow dwarf virus. 5H = high; M = medium; L = low.
5
Table 7. Yield and test weight of oat varieties at three locations in eastern North Dakota, 2014-2016.
Fargo
Edgeley
Langdon
Average Eastern N.D.
Test
Yield
Test
Yield
Test
Yield
Test
Yield
Variety
Wt.
2016 3 Yr. Wt.
2016 3 Yr. Wt. 2016 3 Yr. Wt. 2016 3 Yr.
(lb/bu)
---(bu/a)---
(lb/bu)
---(bu/a)---
(lb/bu) ---(bu/a)---
(lb/bu)
---(bu/a)---
AC Pinnacle
36.1 132.8 169.0 38.8 181.3 178.9 34.9 151.2 169.6 36.6 155.1 172.5
Beach
40.3 122.6 155.0 42.4 174.5 162.3 37.0 146.1 152.9 39.9 147.7 156.7
Beta-Gene
39.4 134.6 168.9 39.4 159.0 158.5
--
--
--
--
--
--
CDC Dancer
39.4 135.6 152.1 39.5 171.9 153.2 36.3 131.6 160.9 38.4 146.4 155.4
CDC Minstrel
37.6 135.0 167.8 37.1 168.9 159.4 33.2 145.3 160.9 36.0 149.7 162.7
Deon
40.1 148.1 170.0 41.3 183.6 165.9 35.5 161.6 170.4 39.0 164.4 168.8
Furlong
36.9 130.9 149.1
--
--
--
37.0 151.6 165.0
--
--
--
Goliath
41.4 136.6 159.3 42.3 170.3 163.4 36.2 131.7 155.8 40.0 146.2 159.5
Hayden
39.8 144.1 --
42.7 173.2
--
38.3 133.8
--
40.3 150.4
--
HiFi
38.8 125.1 143.6 40.4 164.1 159.4 35.8 139.4 156.4 38.3 142.9 153.1
Horsepower
41.5 131.5 145.8 40.9 150.7 142.5
--
--
--
--
--
--
Hytest
41.1 121.6 138.7 42.9 134.1
--
38.5 102.2 122.7 40.8 119.3 130.7
Jury
41.4 134.0 164.9 41.9 159.3 157.2 34.9 127.8 148.3 39.4 140.4 156.8
Killdeer
37.0 129.9 165.6
--
--
--
35.9 154.3 164.6
--
--
--
Leggett
38.5 140.1 168.9 40.4 153.2 154.0 37.1 157.0 170.5 38.7 146.7 164.5
Newburg
40.4 137.4 156.9 40.0 172.6 160.8 33.7 139.4 159.0 38.0 149.8 158.9
Otana
38.4 117.9 122.4 38.5 143.2 133.7 34.3 100.0 126.6 37.1 120.4 127.6
Paul1
42.4
79.7 102.2 45.6 118.7 116.7 44.2 98.5 119.8 44.1 99.0 112.9
Rockford
41.0 139.8 142.5 41.6 163.0 155.3 36.8 124.8 141.7 39.8 142.5 146.5
Souris
40.2 130.9 141.2 39.3 168.4 153.8 34.8 136.2 152.5 38.1 145.2 149.2
Stallion
41.5 132.3 157.4 41.2 155.5 149.1 35.9 106.6 141.3 39.5 131.5 149.3
Mean
39.6 132.3 152.1 40.9 162.2 154.4 36.2 134.5 152.2 39.1 141.0 151.6
CV %
5.7
6.4
--
1.7
7.3
--
3.1 12.4
--
3.2
6.6
--
LSD 0.05
3.7
13.6
--
1.1
19.2
--
1.5 23.8
--
2.0 14.9 11.1
LSD 0.10
3.1
11.4
--
0.9
16.1
--
1.3 19.9
--
1.7 12.5
9.3
1Hull-less varieties. When comparing yield of hull-less oat varieties with varieties with hulls, multiply the yield of the hull-less oats by 1.35
(the hull of a hulled kernel is 35 percent of the weight).
6
Table 8. Yield and test weight of oat varieties at four locations in western North Dakota, 2014-2016.
Dickinson
Hettinger
Minot
Williston
Average Western N.D.
Test
Yield
Test
Yield
Test
Yield
Test
Yield
Test
Yield
Variety
Wt. 2016 3 Yr. Wt. 2016 3 Yr. Wt. 2016 3 Yr. Wt. 2016 3 Yr. Wt. 2016 3 Yr.
(lb/bu) ----(bu/a)---- (lb/bu) ----(bu/a)---- (lb/bu) ----(bu/a)---- (lb/bu) ----(bu/a)---- (lb/bu) ----(bu/a)----
AC Pinnacle 37.1 150.3 176.0 36.9 77.4 143.8 40.3 150.9 138.0 45.2 103.3 90.9 39.9 120.5 137.2
Beach
38.1 130.9 138.8 38.2 59.6 131.8 42.2 144.4 150.9 47.5 86.0 64.3 41.5 105.2 121.5
CDC Dancer 37.0 135.3 149.1 37.3 62.4 135.0 37.8 140.1 143.5 45.7 101.1 84.1 39.5 109.7 127.9
CDC Minstrel 35.5 133.9 159.2 33.7 65.9 147.9 39.4 159.6 151.4 45.8 105.8 82.7 38.6 116.3 135.3
Deon
35.5 126.9 150.9 36.0 64.0 146.0 41.5 164.8 142.5 45.7 82.3 76.8 39.7 109.5 129.1
Furlong
34.0 130.5 153.1 33.5 59.0 148.8 40.0 152.7 146.1 44.2 101.1 74.3 37.9 110.8 130.6
Goliath
36.4 103.5 130.9 37.5 54.6 142.6 40.8 150.2 134.4 47.0 77.7
--
40.4 96.5 --
Haydon
36.6 140.7 -- 37.0 68.9 -- 41.6 160.6 --
--
--
--
--
--
--
HiFi
34.4 123.3 142.3 36.0 61.6 124.1 38.9 154.2 131.5 45.3 92.4 72.3 38.7 107.9 117.6
Hytest
37.3 108.3 132.0 39.7 53.7 102.5 41.4 144.2 135.2 46.8 77.0 60.9 41.3 95.8 107.7
Jury
37.1 111.2 132.1 36.2 55.5 142.4 39.9 136.4 130.4 46.3 81.6 74.3 39.9 96.2 119.8
Killdeer
35.4 125.3 142.4 36.3 61.6 144.6 40.6 129.2 126.4 45.3 111.9 81.6 39.4 107.0 123.8
Leggett
36.0 133.4 160.2 35.9 61.5 143.1 39.2 136.8 134.7 45.4 104.4 77.0 39.1 109 128.8
Newburg
36.0 115.9 145.7 35.7 63.9 146.1 41.3 147.6 133.4 46.3 84.6 75.7 39.8 103 125.2
Otana
36.9 126.1 144.0 36.4 63.8 133.8 40.0 136.3 122.1 45.4 86.2 80.1 39.7 103.1 120.0
Paul1
38.6 91.8 109.7 41.1 46.2 109.1 45.0 102.0 111.6 51.9 62.6 52.2 44.2 75.7 95.7
Rockford
36.6 133.2 150.6 38.7 65.3 150.5 42.2 128.7 120.2 46.5 100.5 75.9 41.0 106.9 124.3
Souris
35.8 111.5 143.3 36.6 64.0 120.8 40.9 145.7 126.6 46.3 93.0 76.0 39.9 103.6 116.7
Stallion
39.1 118.4 143.0 37.4 59.6 125.7 38.0 121.6 143.5 46.2 92.1 62.9 40.2 97.9 118.8
Mean
35.7 123.7 144.6 36.0 61.5 135.5 40.0 142.4 134.6 45.7 91.3 74.2 40.0 104.7 122.2
CV %
3.8 9.0
--
3.6 9.1 --
1.8 8.8
--
5.9
1.2
--
2.5 8.5 7.0
LSD 0.05
1.9 15.5 --
1.8 8.0 --
1.2 21.0 --
7.6
0.7
--
1.4 12.2 12.0
LSD 0.10
1.6 12.9 --
1.5 6.7 --
1.0 17.5 --
6.4
0.6
--
1.2 10.1 10.0
1Hull-less varieties. When comparing yield of hull-less oat varieties with varieties with hulls, multiply the yield of the hull-less oats by 1.35
(the hull of a hulled kernel is 35 percent of the weight).
7
Table 9. 2016 North Dakota winter rye variety descriptions.
Year
Straw
Variety
Origin1
Released
Height
Strength
AC Hazlet
Canada
2006
Med.
Good
Maturity Med.
Seed Color Blue
Seed Size Large
Test Weight Good
Winter Hardiness V.good
AC Rifle
Canada
1994
Short
V.good
Med.
Blue
Med.
Med.
V.good
AC Remington
Canada
1998
Short
V.good
Med.
NA2
Med.
Good
Good
Aroostok
USDA
1981
Tall
Fair
Early
NA
Small
High
V.good
Ensi
Finland
1933
Tall
Fair
Late
NA
Small
Low
NA
Dacold
ND
1989
Med.
Good3
V.late
Bl-grn.
Med.
Low
Good
Frederick
SD
1984
Tall
Fair
Late
Tan
Med.
High
Good
Hancock
WI
1979
Tall
Good
Med.
Tan
Large
High
Fair4
Musketeers
Canada
1980
Tall
Fair
M.early
Blue
Large
Med.
V.good
ND Dylan
ND
2016
Tall
Good
Med
Blue
Med.
High
V. good
Prima
Canada
1984
Tall
Good
Med.
Blue
Large
Med.
V.good
Rymin
MN
1973
Tall
V.good
Late
Grn-gray Large
High
Fair4
Spooner
WI
1993
Tall
V.good
Med.
Tan
Large
High
Good
Wheeler
MI
1971
Tall
Fair
Med.
NA
Large
Low
Good
Wrens Abruzzi
GA
1953
Tall
Fair
Early
NA
Small
High
1ND = North Dakota State University; SD = South Dakota State University; WI = University of Wisconsin; MN = University of Minnesota; MI = Michigan State University. GA = Georgia. 2NA = not available. 3Under certain environments, lodging has been observed. 4Varieties with fair winter hardiness should not be seeded in bare soil.
Good
Table 10. Yield and test weight of winter rye varieties at three locations in North Dakota, 2014-2016.
Hettinger
Langdon
Minot
Average
Test
Seed Yield
Test
Seed Yield Test
Seed Yield
Test Seed Yield
Variety
Wt.
2016 3-yr.
Wt.
2016
Wt.
2016 2-yr. Avg. Wt. 2016 2/3-yr Avg.
(lb/bu)
--(bu/a)--
(lb/bu)
--(bu/a)-- (lb/bu)
--(bu/a)--
(lb/b)
--(bu/a)--
Aroostok
55.4
45.6 48.6
52.6
55.6
53.7
59.0
53.8 53.9 53.4 51.2
Dacold
52.6
72.9 77.3
52.7
76.5
53.4
80.6
75.2 52.9 76.7 76.3
Hancock
54.2
59.9 65.7
54.3
75.8
54.8
78.3
73.6
54.4 71.3 69.7
Musketeer
54.3
70.7 --
54.0
64.7
55.0
81.9
--
54.4 72.4
--
ND Dylan
--
--
--
52.3
84.0
54.4
95.2
83.4
-- --
--
Rymin
54.2
62.1 --
53.5
65.8
54.8
77.5
--
54.2 68.5
--
Spooner
55.5
57.3 56.9
54.2
67.4
54.5
79.3
67.5 54.7 68.0 62.2
Mean
54.4
61.4 62.1
53.4
70.0
54.4
78.8
70.7 54.0 70.1 64.8
CV %
1.0
9.0
--
1.6
8.3
0.8
4.6
--
1.2 6.1
--
LSD 0.05
0.8
8.0
--
1.2
8.5
0.6
5.2
--
1.1 7.3
--
LSD 0.10
0.7
6.7
--
1.0
7.0
0.5
4.3
--
0.9 6.0
--
For more information on this and other topics, see www.ag.ndsu.edu NDSU encourages you to use and share this content, but please do so under the conditions of our Creative Commons license. You may copy, distribute, transmit and adapt this work as long as you give full attribution, don't use the work for commercial purposes and share your resulting work similarly. For more information, visit www.ag.ndsu.edu/agcomm/creative-commons. County commissions, North Dakota State University and U.S. Department of Agriculture cooperating. NDSU does not discriminate in its programs and activities on the basis of age, color, gender expression/identity, genetic information, marital status, national origin, participation in lawful off-campus activity, physical or mental disability, pregnancy, public assistance status, race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, spousal relationship to current employee, or veteran status, as applicable. Direct inquiries to Vice Provost for Title IX/ADA Coordinator, Old Main 201, NDSU Main Campus, 701-231-7708, ndsu.eoaa.ndsu.edu. This publication will be made available in alternative formats for people with disabilities upon request, 701-231-7881. 1200-11-16;8revised-12-16

File: barley-oat-and-rye.pdf
Title: ND Barley, Oat and Rye Variety Trial Results for 2016 and Selection Guide A1049
Author: Joel Ransom
Subject: Barley, oat and rye varieties currently grown in North Dakota are described in the following tables. Successful production of these crops depends on numerous factors, including selecting the right variety for a particular area. Characteristics to evaluate in selecting a variety are: yield potential in your area, test weight, straw strength, plant height, reaction to problematic diseases and maturity.
Published: Mon Dec 12 10:49:01 2016
Pages: 8
File size: 0.26 Mb


Life on Mars, 18 pages, 1 Mb

Coping with Loneliness, 39 pages, 0.38 Mb
Copyright © 2018 doc.uments.com