Occurrence of loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) in the Gulf of California, Mexico: evidence of life-history variation in the Pacific Ocean, JA Seminoff, A Resendiz, B Resendiz

Tags: Gulf of California, loggerhead turtles, Baja California, loggerheads, sea turtles, satellite telemetry, los Angeles, the Pacific, Japan, National Marine Fisheries Service, BLA, Baja California Sur, Sea Turtle, reported, pelagic habitat, Baja California peninsula, loggerhead, California, Sea Turtle Research Station, neritic zone, Limpus, Southwest Fisheries Science Center NOAA, Australia, Loggerhead Sea Turtle, Infiernillo Channel, Herpetological Review, Loggerhead Sea Turtles, CIN, SEMINOFF, J. A. SEMINOFF, pp, Johann Georg Wagler, RESENDIZ, Caretta caretta, K. GOTO, Australian Nature Conservation Agency, the Pacific coast, Ramirez Cruz, W. J. NICHOLS, J. NICHOLS, Gulf
Content: Herpetological Review, 2004, 35(1), 24­27. © 2004 by Society for the Study of amphibians and reptiles Occurrence of Loggerhead Sea Turtles (Caretta caretta) in the Gulf of California, Mйxico: Evidence of Life-History Variation in the Pacific Ocean JEFFREY A. SEMINOFF* Archie Carr Center for Sea Turtle Research and Department of Zoology University of Florida, P.O. Box 118525, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA ANTONIO RESENDIZ Instituto Nacional de Ecologнa, Direccнon General de Vida Silvestre Secretaria de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales Ensenada, Baja California, Mйxico BEATRIS RESENDIZ Sea Turtle Research Station, Bahнa de Los Angeles Baja California, Mйxico and WALLACE J. NICHOLS Wildcoast, P.O. Box 324, Davenport, California 95017, USA and Department of Herpetology, California Academy of Sciences Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, California 94118, USA *Present address: Southwest Fisheries Science Center NOAA ­ National Marine Fisheries Service, 8604 La Jolla Shores Drive La Jolla, California 92037, USA; e-mail: [email protected] Loggerhead turtles, Caretta caretta, are highly migratory and use a wide range of broadly separated localities and habitats during their lifetime. In the Pacific, most loggerheads carry out an extensive developmental migration, traveling from nesting areas in Japan and Australia to distant developmental and foraging habitats in the eastern Pacific (Bowen 1995; Bowen et al. 1995; Uchida and Teruya 1988; P. Dutton, unpubl. data). After spending years foraging in the eastern Pacific, these turtles return to their natal nesting beaches for reproduction (Nichols et al. 2000; Resendiz et al. 1998) and remain in the western Pacific for the remainder of their life cycle (Hatase et al. 2002; Kamezaki et al. 1997; Sakamoto et al. 1997). At least some loggerhead turtles, however, apparently do not undertake trans-Pacific migrations and instead remain in the western Pacific for their entire life cycle (Limpus et al. 1994). Loggerhead sea turtles in the Pacific are adversely impacted by a variety of activities including incidental capture in commercial fisheries, boat strikes, debris ingestion, and intentional harvest (Gardner and Nichols 2001; Suganuma 2002; Wetherall 1996). These have contributed, at least in part, to declines in annual nesting populations in Japan (Suganuma 2002) and Australia (Limpus and Couper 1994; Limpus and Reimer 1994). These reductions have prompted calls for increased research and protection (National Marine Fisheries Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1998). However, the development of appropriate management strategies has been hindered by the paucity of data on the biology of loggerhead turtles. Knowledge of regional size-class distributions of loggerhead turtles can help determine the importance of different marine habitats for various life stages, and provide insights into the geographic variability in life history patterns (Bjorndal et al. 2000; Bolten, in press; Witzell 2002). An important component of this understand-
ing is the size at which juveniles depart the oceanic zone (i.e., seafloor depth > 200 m; Lalli and Parsons 1993) and recruit to neritic foraging habitats (i.e., seafloor depth 200 m; Lalli and Parsons 1993). Size-at-recruitment to the neritic zone is an important element in the development of sea turtle population models (Bjorndal et al. 2000; Bolten, in press; Crouse et al. 1987) but is poorly understood in the Pacific: current knowledge is based solely on Limpus et al. (1994) who report a neritic recruitment size of 70 cm curved carapace length in Australia based on in-water research. However, the vast size and substantial variation in coastal bathymetry of the Pacific (Briggs 1974) combined with potential lifehistory differences between Japanese and Australian nesting stocks suggest that the size-at-recruitment for loggerhead sea turtles in Australia may not be representative of the entire Pacific. In the Atlantic, for example, some loggerheads may recruit to neritic habitats at substantially smaller sizes (starting at 25.0 cm curved carapace length along the US Atlantic coast; Musick and Limpus 1997). The purpose of this report is to present information on the size of loggerhead sea turtles in neritic habitats of the Gulf of California. This will provide researchers with a small data set with which to compare Demographic data from other locations in the Pacific Ocean. From 1996 to 2002 we documented the presence of loggerhead turtles at two study areas in the central Gulf of California: Bahнa de los Angeles (BLA) and the Infiernillo Channel (CIN), along the coasts of Baja California and Sonora, Mйxico, respectively (Fig. 1). These areas are neritic feeding grounds for green turtles, Chelonia mydas (Cliffton et al. 1982; Seminoff 2000), and the large abundance of invertebrate fauna (Brusca 1980) suggest they are potential foraging areas for loggerhead turtles. Efforts to document loggerhead turtle presence included: (1) in-water capture of live turtles (2) beach surveys for dead carcasses, and (3) documentation of turtle consumption in human Coastal Communities. We attempted to capture loggerhead turtles with entanglement nets (100 m x 8 m, mesh size = 50 cm stretched) placed along the shallow perimeter of each study area. Distance from shore and water depth of netting sites ranged from 50 m to 500 m, and 2 m to 27 m, respectively. Nets were set during both day and night and monitored regularly. Turtles were removed immediately upon capture and held captive up to 24 h. We calculated catch per unit effort (CPUE) with each unit effort equaling the deployment of one 100-m net for 24 h. At BLA and CIN we recorded straight carapace length (SCL; ± 0.1 cm) and curved carapace length (CCL; ± 0.1 cm), respectively, from the nuchal notch to the posteriormost portion of the rear marginals. We converted all CCL measurements to SCL using the conversion equation: CCL = 1.388 + (1.053) SCL (Bjorndal et al. 2000). Prior to release each turtle was double tagged with Inconel tags (Style 681; National Band and Tag Company, Newport, Kentucky); one tag in the first large proximal scale of each front flipper. To quantify the occurrence of deceased loggerheads we conducted beach surveys along coastal perimeters of each study area. Each survey of the Infiernillo Channel coast covered 16 km of coastline. Surveys were conducted quarterly in March, June, September, and December, 1999­2001 (N = 12). At Bahнa de los Angeles each survey encompassed 5 km of shoreline, and surveys were performed monthly from June to September, 1996­2002 (N = 26). In addition, we searched fish camps and refuse dumps near
Herpetological Review 35(1), 2004
FIG. 1. Map of northwestern Mйxico showing Bahнa de los Angeles (BLA) and Infiernillo Channel (CIN) regions in the Gulf of California, and Bahнa Magdalena (BMA) along the Pacific coast of the Baja California peninsula.
harvest of a variety of finfish species (JAS, pers. obs.). We saw no evidence of contact with oil or tar, no turtles had boat collision or propeller damage, and necropsies of these turtles revealed that both had full stomachs at the time of death. Overall, the seven live-captured loggerheads from BLA represent 3.2% of all live-captured sea turtles (including Chelonia mydas, Eretmochelys imbricata, and Lepidochelys olivacea) at that area over the same time period (Seminoff 2000). The CPUE for the seven live turtles captured at BLA was 0.014, or one loggerhead capture every 1699 h of netting effort. At CIN, no live loggerhead turtles were captured despite 624 h of netting effort. The eight dead loggerhead turtles represent 6.6% of all deceased turtles found at the two areas (Seminoff 2000; Seminoff, unpubl. data). We are unaware of the habitats from which deceased turtles originated, but the capture of live turtles provides useful information on the distribution of loggerheads. In the Gulf of California some loggerhead turtles apparently shift from the oceanic juvenile phase to the neritic juvenile phase at a size that is smaller than that reported for populations in the western Pacific Ocean. While Limpus et al. (1994) report settlement sizes starting at 65.2 cm SCL (70.0 cm CCL) in the southern Great Barrier Reef of Australia, the smallest live loggerhead turtle encountered during this study measured 43.5 cm SCL. Olguin-Mena (1990) and Resendiz et al. (1999) reported minimum sizes of 37 cm SCL and 29.9 cm SCL, respectively, for loggerheads in similar habitats within the Gulf of California. Based on these data, the sizes at which some loggerheads recruit to neritic habitats in the Gulf of California appear more similar to those for loggerheads along the US Atlantic coast (2546 cm CCL; Bjorndal et al. 2001; Musick and Limpus 1997). Although the mechanisms of dispersal into the Gulf of California are unclear, our study illustrates the potential variability of loggerhead life-history in the Pacific Ocean. The factors that contribute to apparent differences in neritic recruitment size are poorly understood and caution should be exercised in formulating theo-
each study site once each year (NBLA = 7; NCIN = 3). Data were recorded on each sea turtle carcass found, following Gardner and Nichols (2001). Measurements followed the same procedure as that for live-captured turtles. We described presence of external abnormalities, carried out necropsies when possible (Work 2000), and recorded cause of death when known. After each carcass was examined, it was marked with all-weather spray paint or collected to avoid duplicate counting. We recorded a total of 15 loggerhead turtles during this study: 10 (seven live-captured, two floating dead, and one at a dumpsite) at BLA and five (all at dumpsites) at CIN. Mean straight carapace length of loggerhead turtles was 61.9 (SE = 2.1; range = 43.5­ 92.7 cm). There was no difference in the mean SCL between the two sites (t = 0.35; P = 0.73), nor was there a difference in the mean SCL of live and deceased turtles (t = 0.54; P = 0.29). A summary of the size and manner of collection for each turtle is presented in Table 1. We could not determine the cause of death for the six loggerheads found at dumpsites; however, the fact that all had meat removed and were actively discarded suggests human consumption was likely. For the two loggerhead turtles encountered floating near BLA, mortality may have been from incidental capture in local fisheries: gillnets are commonly utilized in the region for
TABLE 1. Summary of Caretta caretta recorded from the Gulf of California 1996 to 2001. Disposition codes include: L ­ live captured; F ­ floating in water; D ­ found dead at dumpsite.
Date 1 January 1996 4 September 1997 31 October 1997 22 August 1998 4 February 1999 6 September 1999 19 September 1999 26 June 2001 2 August 2001 2 July 2002
Size (cm SCL) Bahнa de los Angeles 47.7 69.4 49.7 75.4 92.7 43.5 63.0 61.1 57.7 67.4
Disposition F L L F L L L L D L
Infiernillo Channel
1 June 2000
18 June 2000
7 March 2001
9 March 2001
4 June 2001
Herpetological Review 35(1), 2004
TABLE 2. Comparison of size data for loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) in the Gulf of California and Pacific coast of the Baja California Peninsula, Mйxico.
Site Mean SCL ± SE Range (cm) N
Gulf of Californiaa 61.9 ± 2.1 43.5 ­ 92.7 15
Pacific Coast of Baja Californiab 58.5 ± 11.1 26.6 ­ 83.4 180
Pacific Coast of Baja Californiab 46.9 ± 1.3 32 ­ 58 39
a this study. b Data from Gardner and Nichols (2001). Data are for stranded turtles only. Mean is reported with Standard Deviation. c Data from Ramirez Cruz et al. (1991). Data are for live-captured turtles.
ries about neritic recruitment patterns based on the few studies that have occurred to date. Moreover, as reported for Atlantic loggerheads by Witzell (2002), the shift from pelagic to coastal habitats may be flexible. Some immature turtles may remain in the pelagic habitat longer than hypothesized, and some may move back and forth between pelagic and coastal foraging habitats. These variable data underscore the need for additional comparative studies of intrinsic and environmental effects on loggerhead turtles to assess their relative influence on habitat preference. Considering that most sea turtles attain maturity at or near mean nesting size (Chaloupka and Musick 1997), the size range in this study (43.5­92.7 cm SCL) is indicative of a population consisting primarily of juveniles and sub-adults. All but one turtle encountered during this study was smaller than the mean nesting size in Japan (89.0 cm SCL; Uchida and Nishiwaki 1982). A preponderance of juvenile sizes has also been reported for loggerheads along the Pacific Coast of Baja California (Nichols 2002; Olguin-Mena 1990; Ramirez Cruz et al. 1991). These findings are consistent with the prevailing life-history model that depicts the eastern Pacific as an important juvenile developmental habitat (Bowen et al. 1995). The mean size of loggerheads examined in this study (61.9 ± 2.1 cm SCL) is significantly larger than that reported by Ramirez Cruz et al. (1991) for live loggerheads from the Pacific coast of the Baja California Peninsula (t = 6.029, P < 0.0001; Table 2; Fig. 1). Moreover, the maximum SCL in this study (92.7 cm) is larger than that reported for both live (58 cm; Ramirez Cruz et al. 1991) and stranded (83.4 cm; Gardner and Nichols 2001) loggerhead turtles from the Pacific. Consistent with our results, Mбrquez (1969) reported that the larger of two loggerheads found in the Gulf measured 92.0 cm SCL. Although the greater size of loggerheads in the Gulf of California relative to the Pacific coast of the Baja California peninsula may be because of small sample sizes, we believe this difference might result from the semi-enclosed nature of the Gulf of California. Perhaps the Baja California peninsula acts as a land barrier, delaying the westward journey of loggerheads in the Gulf of California. Nichols et al. (2000) reported that a loggerhead turtle returning to Japan from Baja California maintained a westward bearing regardless of surface current patterns. If bearing-specific homing is characteristic of all Pacific loggerheads, then return movements of individuals in the Gulf of California, that must first move south to depart the Gulf, might be delayed relative to those of loggerheads on the west side of the Baja California peninsula that have an unimpeded westbound route. We encourage additional studies to substantiate the comparatively large mean size observed in this study. Moreover,
satellite telemetry might be a useful tool to investigate this `peninsular barrier' hypothesis and establish the route taken by loggerheads as they depart the Gulf of California. The low capture per unit effort in this study suggests that the Gulf of California may not provide critical habitat for loggerhead turtles in the eastern Pacific. Nevertheless, given consideration of the recent population decline for Pacific loggerheads, the Gulf region should be included as a target area for efforts to protect this endangered marine species. Acknowledgments.--This research was supported by Wallace Research Foundation, Earthwatch Institute, and David and Lucile Packard Foundation. We are indebted to J. Gilmore, G. Hoeffer, J. Lopez, L. Monti, G. Nabhan, B. Resendiz, H. Romero, O. Savin, T. Smith, L. Yarnell, and the Earthwatch team members for assistance with field activities. We thank A. Bass, A. Bolten, K. Lohmann, Y. Matsuzawa, and W. Witzell for helpful comments that improved previous versions of this manuscript. Turtle capture was authorized by Secretaria del Medio Ambiente, Recursos Naturales, y Pesca, Mйxico (Permit Nos. 150496-213-03, 280597-213-03, 190698-213-03, and 280499-213-03). All turtle handling was in full compliance with University of Florida IACUC protocol (#Z049). LITERATURE CITED BJORNDAL, K. A., A. B. BOLTEN, AND H. R. MARTINS. 2000. Somatic growth model of juvenile loggerhead sea turtles, Caretta caretta: duration of pelagic stage. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 202:265­272. ­­­­­­, ­­­­­­, B. KOIKE, B. A. SCHROEDER, D. J. SHAVER, W. G. TEAS, AND W. N. WITZELL. 2001. Somatic growth function for immature loggerhead sea turtles, Caretta caretta, in southeastern U.S. waters. Fish. Bull. 99:240­246. BOLTEN, A. B. In press. Active swimmers ­ passive drifters: the oceanic juvenile stage of loggerheads in the Atlantic system. In A. B. Bolten and B. E. Witherington (eds.), Biology and Conservation of the Loggerhead Sea Turtle. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. BOWEN, B. W. 1995. Tracking marine turtles with genetic markers. BioScience 45:528­534. ­­­­­­, F. A. ABREU GROBOIS, G. H. BALAZS, N. KAMEZAKI, C. J. LIMPUS, AND R. J. FERL. 1995. Trans-Pacific migrations of the loggerhead sea turtle demonstrated with mitochondrial DNA markers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92:3731­3734. BRIGGS, J. C. 1974. Marine Zoogeography. McGraw-Hill, New York. 475 pp. BRUSCA, R. C. 1980. Intertidal invertebrates of the Gulf of California. University of Arizona Press, Tucson. 513 pp. CHALOUPKA, M. Y., AND J. A. MUSICK. 1997. Age, growth, and population dynamics. In P. L. Lutz and J. A. Musick (eds.), Biology of Sea Turtles, pp. 233­273. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida. CLIFFTON, K., D. O. CORNEJO, AND R. S. FELGER. 1982. Sea turtles of the Pacific coast of Mйxico. In K. Bjorndal (ed.), Biology and Conservation of Sea Turtles, pp. 199­209. Smithsonian Institution Press, Wash-
Herpetological Review 35(1), 2004
ington, D.C. CROUSE, D. T., L. B. CROWDER, AND H. CASWELL. 1987. A stage-based model for loggerhead sea turtles and implications for conservation. Ecology 68:1412­1423. GARDNER, S. C., AND W. J. NICHOLS. 2001. Assessment of sea turtle mortality rates in the Bahнa Magdalena region, Baja California Sur, Mйxico. Chel. Cons. Biol. 4:197­199. HATASE H., N. TAKAI, Y. MATSUZAWA, W. SAKAMOTO, K. OMUTA, K. GOTO, N. ARAI, T. FUJIWARA. 2002. Size-related differences in feeding habitat use of adult female loggerhead turtles Caretta caretta around Japan determined by stable isotope analyses and satellite telemetry. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 233:273­281. KAMEZAKI, N., I. MIYAKAWA, H. SUGANUMA, K. OMUTA, Y. NAKAJIMA, K. GOTO, K. SATO, Y. MATSUZAWA, M. SAMEJIMA, M. ISHII, AND T. IWAMOTO. 1997. Post-nesting migration of Japanese loggerhead turtles, Caretta caretta. Wildl. Cons. Japan 3:29­39. LALLI, C. M., AND T. R. PARSONS. 1993. Biological Oceanograpy: An Introduction. Pergamon Press, New York. 301 pp. LIMPUS, C. J., AND P. COUPER. 1994. Loggerheads: a species in decline. Wildl. Aust. 30:11­13. ­­­­­­, ­­­­­­, AND M. A. READ. 1994. The loggerhead turtle, Caretta caretta, in Queensland: population structure in a warm temperate feeding area. Mem. Queensland Mus. 37:195­204. ­­­­­­, AND D. REIMER. 1994. The loggerhead turtle, Caretta caretta, in Queensland: a population in decline. In R. James (comp.), Proceedings of the Australian Marine Turtle Conservation Workshop. pp. 39­59. Queensland Dept. of Env. and Heritage, and Australian nature conservation Agency, Canberra. MБRQUEZ, M. R. 1969. Additional records of the Pacific loggerhead turtle, Caretta caretta gigas from the North Mexican Pacific Coast. J. Herpetol. 3:108­110. MUSICK, J. A., AND C. J. LIMPUS. 1997. Habitat utilization and migration in juvenile sea turtles. In P. L. Lutz and J. A. Musick (eds.), The Biology of Sea Turtles, pp. 137­163. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida. NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE AND U. S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE. 1998. Recovery plan for U.S. Pacific Populations of the loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta). National Marine Fisheries Service, Silver Spring, MD. 59 pp. NICHOLS, W. J. 2002. Biology and conservation of the sea turtles of Baja California. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson. 540 pp. ­­­­­­, A. RESENDIZ, J. A. SEMINOFF, AND B. RESENDIZ. 2000. Transpacific migration of a loggerhead turtle monitored by satellite telemetry. Bull. Mar. Sci. 67:937­947. OLGUIN-MENA, M. 1990. Las tortugas marinas en la costa oriental de Baja California y costa Occidental de Baja California Sur, Mйxico. M.S. Thesis. Univ. Auto. B. C. S., La Paz, Mйxico. 74 pp. RAMIREZ CRUZ, J. C., I. PENA RAMIREZ, AND D. VILLANUEVA FLORES. 1991. Distribucion y abundancia de la tortuga perica, Caretta caretta Linnaeus (1758), en la costa occidental de Baja California Sur, Mexico. Archelon 1:1­4. RESENDIZ, A., B. RESENDIZ, W. J. NICHOLS, J. A. SEMINOFF, AND N. KAMEZAKI. 1998. First confirmed east-west transpacific movement of a loggerhead sea turtle, Caretta caretta, released in Baja California, Mexico. Pac. Sci. 52:151­153. ­­­­­­, B. JIMENEZ DE RESENDIZ, J. A. SEMINOFF, AND W. J. NICHOLS. 1999. Research and management of loggerhead sea turtles, Caretta caretta, at the CRIP Sea Turtle Research Station, Bahia de Los Angeles, Baja California, Mйxico. In F. A. Abreu-Grobois, R. Briseсo, R. Mбrquez, and L. Sarti (comps.), Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Symposium on Sea Turtle Biology and Conservation, pp. 145­146. NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-SEFC-436. SAKAMOTO, W., T. BANDO, N. ARAI, AND N. BABA. 1997. Migration paths of adult female and male loggerhead turtles, Caretta caretta, determined through satellite telemetry. Fish. Sci. 63:547­552.
SEMINOFF, J. A. 2000. Biology of the East Pacific green turtle, Chelonia mydas agassizii, at a warm temperate foraging area in the Gulf of California, Mйxico. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Arizona, Tucson. 249 pp. SUGANUMA, H. 2002. Population trends and mortality of Japanese loggerhead turtles, Caretta caretta, in Japan. In I. Kinan (ed.), Proc. Western Pacific Sea Turtle Coop. Res. and Mgmt. Workshop, pp. 74­76. Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council, Honolulu, Hawaii. UCHIDA, I., AND M. NISHIWAKI. 1982. Sea turtles in the waters adjacent to Japan. In K. A. Bjorndal (ed.), Biology and Conservation of Sea Turtles, pp. 317­319. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. UCHIDA, S., AND H. TERUYA. 1988. Transpacific migration of a tagged loggerhead, Caretta caretta and tag-return results of loggerheads released from Okinawa Island, Japan. In I. Uchida (ed.), Proc. Int'l. Sea Turtle Symp., pp. 169­182. Hiwasa, Japan. WETHERALL, J. A. 1996. Assessing impacts of Hawaiian longline fishing on Japanese loggerheads and Malaysian leatherbacks: some exploratory studies using TURTSIM. In A. B. Bolten, J. A. Wetherall, G. H. Balazs,and S. G. Pooley (comps.), Status of Marine Turtles in the Pacific Ocean Relevant to Incidental Take in the Hawaii-based Pelagic Longline Fishery, pp. 57­75. NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-SWFSC230. WITZELL, W. N. 2002. Immature Atlantic loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta): suggested changes to the life history model. Herpetol. Rev. 33:266­269. WORK, T. W. 2000. Sea turtle necropsy manual for biologists in remote refuges. U.S. Geological Survey National Wildlife Health Center, Hawaii Field Station. 25 pp. Herpetological Review, 2004, 35(1), 27­31. © 2004 by Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles The Gender of the Genus Scinax Wagler, 1830 (Anura, Hylidae) ULISSES CARAMASCHI Departamento de Vertebrados, Museu Nacional/UFRJ Quinta da Boa Vista, 20940-040 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil e-mail: [email protected] Johann Georg Wagler (1800­1832), German naturalist with a special interest in herpetology and ornithology, produced major treatises in his short life (Adler 1989). Among them, his "Natьrliches System der Amphibien" (1830) is a comprehensive classification, in which the first 129 pages were dedicated to mammals and birds, and the remainder to the "Amphibia" (reptiles included). Higher taxa (order, family, genus) were diagnosed, species were listed with synonymies (some also diagnosed), and footnotes with comments on identification and etymology of the names are provided (Vanzolini 1977). In this work, Wagler proposed the generic name "Scinax, Schnellfrosch" (= "Scinax, quick frog") with the following diagnosis, freely translated from Latin: "Similar to preceding [Phyllomedusa]; body somewhat long; head narrow and snout somewhat long; fingers slender, cylindrical, ending in globulous disc, without webbing; foot half webbed, except the free first toe. (Throat in not inflatable vesicle.) America." The species included in the new genus were Hyla aurata Wied-Neuwied, Hyla variolosa Spix, and Hyla bipunctata Spix. Hyla variolosa, currently a junior synonym of Hyla punctata (Schneider), was also placed as a species belonging to the genus Auletris Wagler. In a footnote, the
Herpetological Review 35(1), 2004

JA Seminoff, A Resendiz, B Resendiz

File: occurrence-of-loggerhead-sea-turtles-caretta-caretta-in-the-gulf.pdf
Title: HR.Dec2003.ver2.pm
Author: JA Seminoff, A Resendiz, B Resendiz
Author: R. W. Hansen
Subject: HR.Dec2003.ver2.pm
Published: Fri Jan 9 06:39:48 2004
Pages: 4
File size: 0.06 Mb

da Silva, 6 pages, 1.89 Mb

Professor ROBIN GERSTER, 20 pages, 0.22 Mb
Copyright © 2018 doc.uments.com