Building Jerusalem: Composition and Chronology, A Ward

Tags: Jerusalem, etched plates, Princeton, Princeton University, Princeton University Press, Blake, Morton D. Paley, William Blake, London, Milton, Oxford, Sir Geoffrey Keynes, Joseph Viscomi, Cumberland, St. Martin's Press, William Blake Prmtmaker, Christine Gallant, David V. Erdman, Peter Ackroyd, G. E. Bentley, Jr., Clarendon Press, Blake's Illuminated Books
Content: ARTICLE Building Jerusalem: Composition and Chronology Aileen Ward Blake/An Illustrated Quarterly, Volume 39, Issue 4, Spring 2006, pp. 183-185
Building Jerusalem: Composition and Chronology BY AILEEN WARD Of all the puzzles surrounding the dates of Blake's poems, that of Jerusalem seems the most intractable. In the absence of a draft, and with only a few contemporary references whose interpretation itself is problematic, critics and editors have settled for the stretch of time from 1804, the date on the title page, to 1820, the latest watermark in the first four complete copies printed, as the probable limits between which Blake composed, etched, revised and printed the hundred plates of the volume.' But within these limits there is great disagreement as to the specific years in which Blake actually composed Jerusalem2--and indeed, exactly what is meant by the composition of any of Blake's illuminated works. The process includes a number of stages separable from each other by varying lengths of time: initial inspiration, whether verbal or visual; drafts of text, sketches of designs; inscribing more or less finished portions of text and accompanying designs on copper; possible revision; etching the plates; printing, coloring, then arranging and binding the printed pages. Indeed, one of Blake's descriptions of the process raises doubts about the reliability of any of his reports on the composition of a specific work.' His apparent references to Jerusalem are too vague to be useful--whether in his 1803 letters to Butts, once alluding to a "long Poem" descriptive of his "Spiritual Acts" during his three years at Felpham, and two months later to "a Sublime Allegory which is now perfectly completed into a Grand Poem" speaking of his "three years trouble," or in his Descriptive Catalogue of 1809, where he refers to a "voluminous" work which he "will, if God please, publish," or in his Public Address of 1810 mentioning a "Poem concerning my Three years Labours at Felpham," soon to be published: all these allusions point more clearly to either
The Four Zoas or Milton.4 In fact, his only direct reference to Jerusalem occurs in a letter to George Cumberland of 12 April 1827 mentioning it as "the Last Work" he produced, one copy of which he has "Finishd," i.e., colored (E 784). Two possible allusions also occur in A Vision of the Last Judgment (1810), where his statement "Imagination is Surrounded by the daughters of Inspiration who in the aggregate are calld Jerusalem" (E 554) sounds remarkably like a description of the title page to Jerusalem, while his later reference to Jerusalem as the Emanation of Albion, which he immediately cancels to identify her as the daughter of Albion and Brittannia (E 558), suggests a stage in the composition of the poem before her role was fixed. However, a more precise dating of Jerusalem was offered by G. E. Bentley, Jr., in his Blake records of 1969 which has since been widely adopted. In 1964 Bentley discovered in an 1807 notebook of George Cumberland's an isolated entry that "Blake has engd. 60 Plates of a new Prophecy!" This, he concluded, must refer to Jerusalem, since it is the only poem of Blake's containing sixty plates or more (BR 187 and n4). He communicated his discovery to David Erdman, who noted it in his 1964 article on Jerusalem but did not adopt Bentley's conclusion as to the date in his edition of Blake's works in 1965 or thereafter--nor did Geoffrey Keynes in his 1966 edition.5 However, in 1977 Bentley extended his argument by specifying thirty-seven "late" plates which for various reasons of internal evidence he believes were added to Jerusalem after 1807,6 leaving some sixty-three as the "early" plates supposedly shown to Cumberland in 1807. Since then, most scholars and editors have followed Bentley's hypothesis that more than half of the work was completed and etched by the summer of 1807.7 Yet there are strong reasons for disagreeing with Bentley's theory. First, there are twenty-six plates containing references to Hand scattered through the poem, which must have been written after Robert Hunt's devastating review of The Grave in 1808 (followed by his still cruder notice of Blake's 1809 Exhibition),8 but of these twenty-six plates only ten are
1. See the table in G. E. Bentley, Jr., Blake Books (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1977; henceforth BB) 226. 2. Both Christine Gallant (Blake and the Assimilation of Chaos [Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978] 49) and James King (William Blake: His Life [New York: St. Martin's Press, 1991] 172-74) argue that it was begun even earlier, at Felpham, 1800-03, as Peter Ackroyd also implies (Blake [London: Sinclair-Stevenson, 1995] 174). Ackroyd thinks it was started "at the same time" as Richard Brothers published A Description of Jerusalem, i.e., 1801 (cf. Morton D. Paley, "William Blake, the Prince of the I lebrews, and the Woman Clothed with the Sun," William Blake: Essays in Honour of Sir Geoffrey Keynes, ed. Morton D. Paley and Michael Phillips [Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973] 273). 3. "When I am commanded by the Spirits then I write. And the moment I have written, I see the Words fly about the room in all directions!.] It is then published!.)--The Spirits can read and my MS: is of no further tue|. |" Henry Crabb Robinson, Reminiscences (1852), in G. E. Bentley, Jr., Blake Records (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969; henceforth BR) 547.
4. The Complete Poetry and Prose of William Blake, ed. David V. Erdman, newly rev. ed. (New York: Doubleday Anchor, 1988; henceforth E) 728,730, 543 (cf. BB 457), 572. 5. David V. Erdman, "The Suppressed and Altered Passages in Blake's lerusalem," Studies in Bibliography 17 (1964): 1-54 and E 730; Geoffrey Keynes, ed., The Complete Writings of William Blake, 2nd ed. (London: Oxford University Press, 1966) 918. 6. BB 225-28: pis. 8,10,11,16,19,33,34,35,42,43,46,47,53,55,56,59, 60,61,63,64,65,66,67, 70, 71, 72, 77, 78, 82,89,92, 93,94,95,96, 99, 100.' 7. Most importantly, Morton D. Paley, ed., Jerusalem, Blake's Illuminated Books, vol. 1 (Princeton: Princeton University Press/Blake Trust; London: Tate Gallery/Blake Trust, 1991) 12, and in The Continuing City: Wdltam Blakes Jerusalem (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983) 2. 8. The Blake concordance (ed. Erdman, 2 vols. [Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1967) 1: 860) lists twenty-five plates (to which 43:50 should be added) referring to "Hand (Symbolic Name)," in thirty-seven separate lines: 5, 7, 8*. 9, 15, 17, 18, 19*, 21, 26, 32, 34*, 36, 42*, 43*, 58 60* 67* 70*. 71*, 74,80, 82*, 83, 84, 90. The ten plates marked with asterisks are' from Bentley's "later" group.
Spring 2006
Blake/An Illustrated Quarterly 183
in the group of thirty-seven that Bentley identifies as "later," i.e., post-1807.9 The other sixteen plates mentioning Hand (in twenty-two separate occurrences) are in the remaining group of sixty-three plates which Bentley would presumably designate as "early" (i.e., 1804-07).'" In addition to these sixteen problematic "early" plates should be added a group of six other "early" plates alluding to events occurring after 1807. Plate 27:25-26 refers to excavations in Paddington in 1811;" plate 38:6-7 refers to the War of 1812 and the executions of Mexican insurgents in 1811 and 1813 (BPAE 482); plate 40:19-24 describes the abolition of the slave trade in 1807 (BPAE 429); plate 45:25 alludes to the new (1815) Bethlehem Hospital as well as to the Battle of Waterloo (lines 55-56), and includes one of many warnings against taking vengeance on the defeated French (lines 36ff.) (BPAE 469, 466, 470). Plate 68:1 Off. contains a song of victory for 1814 or 1815 as well as an allusion to the Russian campaign of 1812 (line 52) like that of plate 86:46.12 Beside these post-1807 allusions, the character of Erin (mentioned seventeen times in twelve different plates)13 symbolizes the new hope for freedom springing up in England with the revival of the cause of Irish independence in the decade of 1810, as Erdman suggests (BPAE 481-84), while the repeated warnings to Albion not to take vengeance on his defeated enemy (BPAE 462,470) must date from 1815 onward.u Thus a total of thirty-four or more plates which apparently were written in 1808 and after should be added to Bentley's group of thirty-seven "later" plates. If approximately seventy-one out of the hundred plates of Jerusalem are then to be dated after 1807, Cumberland's 1807 memorandum that "Blake has eng.d 60 plates of a new Prophecy!" cannot refer to Jerusalem. It has been suggested that Blake simply revised many of these sixty etched plates in the years following 1807 to incorporate the thirty-odd references to Hand and post-1807 events.1'
plates,16 and none of the small number of such revisions which they detect involves the allusions cited above. If it is supposed that Blake revised his text after 1807 by simply discarding already etched plates for new ones, it must be countered that no evidence of such discarded plates survives, and that he was of necessity extremely parsimonious with copper. Almost all of the plates of Jerusalem (like those of most of the other illuminated works) were etched back-to-back in order to save expense, and it appears he was running out of copper as he completed Chapter IV.'" As for revising previously etched or "early" plates to incorporate the twenty-two lines referring to Hand (to say nothing of all the other post-1807 references), it should be noted that only seven "etched variants" are listed by Bentley, including none of these allusions.18 Moreover, Hand is an integral part of the poem from the beginning: he first appears on the sixtieth line of the text (5:25), and the thirty-seven separate allusions to him are scattered fairly evenly throughout the poem as a whole. Revising the etched plates of Jerusalem to incorporate such a number of textual additions after 1807 is thus a virtual impossibility: the "new Prophecy" cannot have been Jerusalem, and can therefore only have been Milton. How then are we to interpret Cumberland's statement? First the possibility of human error or misunderstanding in one form or another should be admitted. Cumberland may have misremembered sixty for fifty, in which case his statement readily applies to Milton, which may well have contained nearly fifty plates in the summer of 1807. Or, since it does not appear from Cumberland's statement that Blake actually showed him sixty plates of an unnamed "new prophecy" but merely mentioned the figure, he may have simply been referring to intermediate stages of its design. Or the "new prophecy" may have denoted an amorphous state in the evolution of both Milton and Jerusalem, in which portions of both were mingled.w
But both Robert Essick and Joseph Viscomi, with their expert knowledge of Blake's printing methods, have described the "extreme difficulty" of making revisions on already etched
16. Robert N. Essick, William Blake Prmtmaker (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980) 109, demonstrating the difficulty of adding new relief lines to the already etched text o\ pL 25 o( Jerusalem; Joseph
Viscomi, Blake and the hlea of the Book (Princeton: Princeton University
Press, 1993)278,342.
17. Cf.BB 113,145,166,208,235-36,308-09,335,381-82; also 225-28
9. The ten "later" plates referring to Hand are 8:41, 43, 44; 19:18; 34:22, 36; 42:47; 43:50; 60:14,43; 67:62; 70:1; 71:11, 22; 82:63. 10. 5:25; 7:18, 71; 9:21; 15:1; 17:62; 18:36, 39; 21:28; 26; 32:10; 36:15, 23; 58:29; 74:49; 80:57; 83:30, 86; 84:20; 90:23, 40, 49. Bentley notes tint "The reference* throughout to Hand, who evidently represents the three Hunt brothers, must date from 1808 or later" (BB 228-29), hut does not correlate these references with his division of early late plates. 11. David V. Erdman, Blake: Prophet Against Empire, 3rd ed (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977; hereafter BPAE) 474. 12. BPAE 466,482. Note also pi. 63:5-6, alluding to the Peace of Paris (BPAE 466), previously counted (note 6). I V Pis.9*, 11*, 12,44,48, 50,72", 74*, 78*, 86, 88,94'. Asterisks iudi cate plates counted previously, leaving eight new post-1807 allusions. 14. Pis. 25:3-6, 36:41-42, 45:2l> 38,47:12 16*, 63:8,fora total of four
on Blake's shortage of "other, more perfect" plates in etching pis. 33, 56, 63, 71-72,92-93, and 100. 18. Bentley, Bfl 237, adds seven other plates containing pen-and-ink variants ,un\ mentions about thirty more minor variations in the designs in his catalogue of the separate plates (238-58); none of these makes significant changes in the text except tor the deleted mottoson pi. 1. Viscomi (}}$ 39) claims felt) til plates bear deletions but mentions specifically only a lew of them, as the notable gougings-out on pi. 3; the few additions to etched plates consist oi page numbers, corrected spellings, and two lines (37/33:1, last tour words, and 43:40) etched in white line on a raised area (Viscomi 254. 256, 340-41, 334; <:i. BB 246, 248; Essick 110-11, 156;Palev,cd.,/(T!/.Mi/(7» 188,203). I1). Bentley, BB 307, suggests the existence in draft of "a poem whkfa Comprehended the actions that were later divided between Milton and
additional post 1807 allusions, not counting pi. 47 (d. noted).
Jerusalem'; I tsick and viscomi leds., Milton a Poem. Blake's Illuminated
15. l'.g.,W. II. Stevenson, ed.. The Poem* <>/ William Blake (london: I ongman, 1971) 622: "To include Hand as .\\\ important figure B. must have revised the poem alter 1808."
Books, vol. 5 [Princeton: Princeton University Press/Blake Trust; London: late (.alien/Blake Trust, 1993] 36) describe "both Milton and Jerusalem as a single project*at one point.
184 Blake/An Illustrated Quarter!}
Spring 2006
But it is also possible that Milton at one time may have contained something like sixty plates, as Bentley himself has thought possible (BR 187n4). Milton clearly went through several stages of expansion and contraction during the course of its composition, as reflected in the varying number of plates in the different copies, and one of the early stages apparently included material about the English Civil War (BPAE 42324), subsequently deleted, which linked it with the Lambeth Prophecies as one more chapter in the history of revolution. Erdman's speculations on "the missing ten books of Milton" (BPAE 423-24) which linger in the background of "the early and late versions," i.e., the "revolutionary version" and the pacifistic version (BPAE 425-27), suggest that at least a few pages of the early twelve-book form were committed to copper before being erased. In 1845}. T. Smith recalled that Blake often "rubbed out" already etched plates "to enable him to use them for other subjects."20 Though he did not describe how these etched plates were erased, presumably an already etched plate could be polished to a clean surface like a new one more readily than it could be revised for corrections or additions.21 If so, this would supply the ten or more pages added to the existing forty-five to fifty pages of Milton (copies A-C) to make up the mysterious "60." One final consideration in the case against the half-finished Jerusalem of 1807 is the date on the title page. How is the date of 1804, inscribed at the bottom of the page, to be understood if the poem was not actually begun until at least 1808? Butlin has commented on Blake's "habit of pre-dating works unparalleled until its adoption by some of the pioneers of the modern movement,"22 which may well be the case here. Jn fact, the only reason for taking 1804 as the date at which Blake started work on Jerusalem is simply the date "1804" of the title page, squeezed in above the signature in a cramped space at the bottom of the page, looking almost like an afterthought. The date is not an integral part of the design of the page, as it is so strikingly in the title page of Milton, or even of the signature itself, as in Visions of the Daughters ofAlbion ("Printed by Will: m Blake : 1793"), The Song of Los, The First Book of Urizen, The Book of Ahania, and The Book of Los. Instead, the date "1804" is etched in white line, i.e., incised on a large dark area, which could readily be done any time after 1804, if indeed the page as a whole was designed and etched that year rather than in 1808 or 1809 or whenever he did in fact begin Jerusalem. The addition of the 1804 date presumably was caused by his desire to link the two poems, as they seem to have been linked in their gestation, or perhaps to tie them both to a significant date in Blake's life, the rebirth of inspiration following his return from Felpham and his acquittal at his January 1804 20. BR 26nf, and cf. Viscomi 389-90n4 and BB 225-28, 335. 21. Sec Viscomi 48-49 on the preparation of the plate for etching or engraving. Viscomi nowhere refers to Smith's statement quoted above, from his 1845 Book for a Rainy Day. 22. Martin Butlin, William Blake (London: Tate Gallery, 1978) 27.
trial, or still more the mysterious experience of renewal at the Truchsessian Gallery in October 1804. To place Jerusalem firmly in the decade of the 1810s sets it in a far more meaningful context of Blake's life than that of the mid-1800s. It links the poem to the mood of contrition and forgiveness of his last work, as contrasted with the spirit of condemnation and self-justification of the ending of Milton. It also answers THE QUESTION of what Blake was doing in the years from 1810 to 1818, when he virtually disappeared from the London art world and apparently produced little work of significance compared with that of the decades immediately preceding and following. Only the hundred plates of Jerusalem, in both its verbal and visual dimensions, fill this puzzling gap in the output of a major artist at the height of his powers. Its record of profound spiritual struggle and triumph in the face of worldly defeat was a labor calling forth all of Blake's imaginative strength. Seen from this perspective, the composition of Jerusalem appears a striking example of what Charles Lamb was the first to describe as the sanity of true genius: as the creative means by which Blake regained his creative wholeness after the crisis of the years preceding 1810. MINUTE PARTICULAR William Blake in "The Vanguard of the Age" BY MORTON D. PALEY I n 1887 there appeared in The Architect: A Weekly Illustrated Journal of Art, Civil Engineering, and Building an illustrated series of articles entitled "The Vanguard of the Age."' Written by Hugh Stannus and illustrated by reproductions of drawings by Herbert Johnson after paintings by Edward Armitage, R.A., these articles were a tribute to Henry Crabb Robinson on the subject of a monument to his memory. The monument comprised a series of paintings commissioned by Robinson's friends and painted by Armitage in 1870-71 on the walls of University Hall, London. Robinson (1775-1867), a founder of the University of London, had also been a mov- 1. 37 (Jan.-Iune 1887): 9-10,23-24, 35,42-44.
Spring 2006
Blake/An Illustrated Quarterly 185

A Ward

File: building-jerusalem-composition-and-chronology.pdf
Title: Building Jerusalem: Composition and Chronology
Author: A Ward
Published: Sat Apr 8 20:47:16 2017
Pages: 4
File size: 0.99 Mb

The natural coumarins, 1 pages, 0.09 Mb

Biofiltration- a Primer, 9 pages, 0.33 Mb

The Tempest. 1611, 1 pages, 0.1 Mb


The Taming of the Shrew, 6 pages, 0.39 Mb

Peter Rabbit Tales, 2 pages, 0.19 Mb

Introduction, 8 pages, 0.04 Mb

Film Directors, 8 pages, 0.04 Mb
Copyright © 2018