Agroecology and the right to food

Tags: food and agriculture, food security, food systems, governments, agricultural investment, local food systems, trade policies, sustainable food systems, a relationship, Committee on World Food Security, food policies, sustainability, food miles, World Trade Organization, future generations, agricultural development, young farmers, external inputs, complementarities, farming, private sector, international agencies, dependency, developing countries, chemical fertilizer
Content: INTERVIEW ­ OLIVIER DE SCHUTTER
Photo: Joyce Fabriek
Agroecology and the
Oliver De Schutter speaks about sustainable food systems at a conference in Wageningen, the Netherlands
right to food
confusion arises because we calculate output only by looking at the commodities that these large farms deliver. And yes, they are
productive, but small farms combine different outputs and are much
Interview: Margriet Goris
more efficient in the way they use resources. Taking into account all the different products, yields from a small farm can be very impressive. The key problem is that we have developed a situation
"Agroecology is really common sense. It means understanding how nature works, to replicate the natural
with industrial farming systems where we have become addicted to fossil fuels and have accelerated greenhouse gas emissions as a result. Food systems have become highly dependent on petrol, but
workings of nature on farms in order to reduce dependency on external inputs. Agroecology preserves the ability for future generations to feed themselves. I believe we should teach more about agroecology and encourage exchanges
we're running out of oil. So, in the future they may not be sustainable. We need alternatives, and there are good arguments from the points of view of Resource Efficiency and resilience to support food systems that are much more agroecological and make much better use of our Natural Resources.
between farmers. We cannot continue in this impasse of an oil dependent food production system."
How is agroecology linked to the right to food? First, agroecology is not the same as organic agriculture. It means
As the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food (2008-14), Olivier De Schutter has spoken out many times on the urgent need for changes in global food systems. In March 2014, he published his final report, making strong recommendations in favour of agroecology.
understanding how nature works, to replicate the complementarities between plants, trees and animals and the natural workings of nature on your farm in order to reduce dependency on external inputs such as chemical fertilizer. This is a sustainable way of producing food as it preserves the ability of future generations to feed themselves. It supports the health of the soil much better, reduces
Why do you recommend supporting small scale dependency on fossil energies, and is also a low cost way of
farmers?
farming. So for farmers in developing countries who have little access to credit and who are much more vulnerable to risk than
We know that small farms are very productive, and more so than farmers in developed countries, agroecology is a very interesting 18 large monocropping farms per unit area of cultivated land. The solution for agricultural development.
LEISA INDIA JUNE 2014
You say production systems should respond to including for younger generations in industrialised countries.
`needs' and not `demands'.
Access to land for them is becoming problematic, just like for peasants in the global South. Because of the inflation in land prices,
Indeed. The problem is that once food is a commodity that responds it's becoming very difficult for 25 year-olds to start in farming
to the laws of supply and demand, it will serve only the needs of today unless their parents were farmers. For young farmers in the
those who have the greatest purchasing power. In other words, it European Union, it is hard to enter into farming because land and
will not serve the basic needs of the poorest people who have no machinery is becoming so expensive. It is therefore necessary to
money or not enough money to spend. food production will be have programmes to improve access to land and to credit, and to
geared towards satisfying the tastes of the richest segments of the ensure that land is used by those who treat it best.
population. Markets for land and water are increasingly global and populations with widely diverging purchasing powers in the What policies are needed for fairer and more
North and the South that have to compete for the same resources. sustainable food systems?
This is creating a paradox in which the luxury tastes of some parts of the world's population are satisfied whereas the basic needs of others are not recognised and cannot be satisfied.
We need policies that are much more coherent from the local to the global. I see many examples of local food systems being rebuilt, with consumers being more active, linking with producers and
What is the role of consumers in changing food supported by municipalities. Local resources can be better used to
systems?
shape food systems that are more sustainable and fair for both consumers and producers. However, very often, such local
Consumers have much more power than they generally initiatives are not supported by national policies or by the global
acknowledge, and I am hopeful that this next generation will make framework. Most of the time, national agricultural policies do not
choices that are much more responsible and informed about the pay attention to local dimensions of food systems. And the global
social and environmental impacts of their ways of purchasing and framework supports the expansion of export-led agriculture but
consuming food. In fact, 15 years ago, very few people had does not support governments to take into account dimensions of
concerns other than to have a large diversity of cheap food available food systems other than those that increase production volumes.
all year round. Now people are much more attentive to the impacts We need more coherence across different levels of governance
of their purchasing practices and they ask questions about labour and much more food democracy. People must be able to hold
rights, sustainability, food miles, etc. I think it's a good thing. Does governments accountable for the results of what food systems
it go far enough? Maybe not. In part because, it still only concerns deliver. There is a need to move agricultural policies into food
a relatively small part of the population, the best informed and the policies so that these other dimensions are taken into account. That
most aware. And also because we have to accept that consuming is why issues of governance are key in achieving the transition
more responsibly, also means consuming less of certain things and towards sustainable food systems.
less meat in particular. We are coming to realise our overconsumption of meat has a huge impact on natural resources, making land and water more scarce. Our current level of meat
In which international body should trade in food and agriculture be discussed?
consumption in the EU is 75 kg per person per year on an average. This is far too much for the environment and also creates a range of health problems. So a move towards healthier lifestyles and changes in how we consume food is desirable and perhaps on the horizon.
There was an attempt in the past four to five years to improve the coherence of different sectoral policies that affect global food security. That led to a reform of the Committee on World Food Security that convenes in Rome under the auspices of the FAO (the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). It
Why is access to land so important?
is a widely representative committee, including all governments,
For many years we thought there was plenty of land available and that there would be no competition for this resource. But the 2008 global food price crisis drew the attention of many governments to the need for securing access to land because global markets were not sufficiently reliable. There was interest for farmland not just from governments but also from private investors. This led to what many call `land grabbing'. Huge areas were bought or leased from 2008 to 2011, though the trend is declining slightly now. So land has become a commodity for which there is competition. The problem is that in many regions, those who use and depend on the land for their livelihoods have no secure access to it. They risk being priced out from land markets and being evicted from the land on which they depend because someone with more purchasing
all international agencies with a relationship to food and agriculture, the private sector, NGO's and farmers organisations, who work together to deliver recommendations for governments. It is my hope that in future, this committee, because it is inclusive and transparent, can have greater influence in shaping reforms at global and national levels. Unfortunately, trade is very much off limits, and the committee is not authorised to discuss in any depth the impact of trade policies on food security. This is all under the mandate of the WTO (World Trade Organization). I think that this is a mistake, and this should be seen as part of the problem. It makes no sense to discuss agricultural investment, food security and Climate change and not to discuss trade, as it has such a huge impact on the shaping of agricultural and food policies.
power can buy it instead of them. It is becoming a serious problem,
19
LEISA INDIA JUNE 2014

File: agroecology-and-the-right-to-food.pdf
Published: Tue Jul 1 14:17:02 2014
Pages: 2
File size: 0.13 Mb


Explorations in Australia, 292 pages, 1.09 Mb

, pages, 0 Mb

The Works, 80 pages, 2.05 Mb

, pages, 0 Mb

Belgium's Energy Market, 14 pages, 0.1 Mb
Copyright © 2018 doc.uments.com