Critical visual methodology: Photographs and narrative text as a visual autoethnography, T Ownby

Tags: Online Journal of Communication, Media Technologies, Special Issue, autoethnography, London, Chicago, visual analysis, self-identity, Thousand Oaks, CA, Wunderkammer, qualitative research, photographs, Retrieved, visual semiotics, semiotic analysis, research, modalities, African Americans, interpretation, image interpretation, ethnographic methods, space exploration, the photograph, photograph, Little League, T. van Leeuwen, Qualitative Social Research, Doctoral Dissertation, Scouting Wunderkammer, LLB, elementary public schools, Scouting, African American, Qualitative data analysis, Altamira Press, visual data, educational research, modality, visual ethnographies, cultural identity, Roland Barthes, Autoethnography Terry Ownby, qualitative methodologies, narrative text, photographic images, narrative texts, visual images, subject matter, New York, data analysis, Boy Scouts of America, Hill and Wang, visual image, Boy Scouts
Content: Online Journal of Communication and media technologies Special Issue ­ January 2013 Critical Visual Methodology: Photographs and Narrative Text as a Visual Autoethnography Terry Ownby, University of Central Missouri, USA Abstract This paper considers how I combined unique qualitative methodologies in a recent study, which examined the construction of self-identity through photographs and narrative text as primary data, in order to develop a visual autoethnography. Critical visual methodology, grounded in Barthesian visual semiotics, was combined with traditional and non-traditional ethnographic methods to interrogate these data in order to construct the autoethnography. These data came from a gallery showing of my photographic exhibition: Wunderkammer: Specimen views of my postmodern life. The resultant analyses of narrative text and photographs revealed an underlying sub-text of significant racial encounters as well as several social and institutional ideological issues that contributed to my findings. Implications from this particular methodological design indicate usefulness not only in photography, but also in allied disciplines such as communication, education, cultural, and media studies. This form of analysis also finds a place in the broader notion of social or cultural identity. Keywords: semiotics, Barthes, critical visual methodology, autoethnography, ethnography 1
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies Special Issue ­ January 2013 Introduction This paper examines the conjugation of dichotomous data through a unique combination of qualitative methodologies in order to construct a visual autoethnography. Ethnographies tend to be written by researchers from one culture looking into a specific, different culture and follow such established methodologies as participant-observation or the ethnographic interview process (Spradley, 1979, 1980). On the other hand, visual ethnographies utilize photographs and other visual content as central data components, which are typically generated by the researcher (Banks, 2007; Pink, 2007). Autoethnography can be an "autobiographical genre of writing and research" (Ellis & Bochner, 2000, p. 739). In this particular instance, that is a visual autoethnography, the combined data entailed researcher generated photographs and personal narrative text, which comprised a gallery exhibit titled: Wunderkammer: Specimen views of my postmodern life (Ownby, 2010). Each photograph had its own narrative panel (see Figure 1) that textually and visually provided discourse for the art patron's understanding of the photograph's subject matter content. These narrative text panels were used in similar fashion to Barthes' (1977) notion of text as anchorage and how a caption interacts with the photograph in that, "the text loads the image" (p. 26) in order to imbricate the two with cultural and ideological artifacts. In order to explicate meaning from these visual and textual discourses therefore, a critical visual analysis (Rose, 2007, 2012) framed within Barthesian visual semiotics, coupled with traditional and non-traditional ethnographic methods (e.g., domain and taxonomic analyses, Spradley, 1979, 1980; research poems, Cahnmann, 2003; Furman, Lietz, & Langer, 2006; Langer & Furman, 2004; Miles & Huberman, 1994; Poindexter, 1998; Richardson, 2000) was used to develop a visual autoethnography. Therefore in this paper, I will focus attention on critical visual methodology (CVM), which was combined with ethnographic methods to interrogate visual and textual data for understanding self-identification construction. 2
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies Special Issue ­ January 2013 Figure 1. Scouting story panel containing narrative text 3
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies Special Issue ­ January 2013 Methods Initially my study was twofold: (1) to understand the construction of self-identity within a particular geographical and ideological culture of my childhood, and (2) integrating the methodological design through an interdisciplinary approach. The primary data analyzed in that visual autoethnography comprised narrative text and photographic images, which necessitated a blending of methods for a holistic view of the narrative that emerged from the original research questions. I called that study a visual autoethnography because the data derived from text and photographs I produced. What follows in this section will describe the various methodologies employed in that research project (Ownby, 2011a). The central question of that research sought to answer concerns of self-identity construction: How self-identity was defined through the construction, deconstruction, and reconstruction of my photographic exhibit called Wunderkammer: Specimen views of my postmodern life. Since autoethnographies tend to be about one's self, as was the case here, my data (N = 18) was purposeful. Both soft and hard data (i.e., "memories of my lived experience" [Wall, 2008, p. 45], and photographs or narrative text) comprised that sample. I refer the reader interested in viewing those photographs and narrative texts to my recently published article (Ownby, 2011b). Primary data for the visual semiotic analysis using the critical visual methodology consisted of photographic images (n = 9), which were composed as still-life compositions of personal artifacts that chronicled my life over half a century. In addition, there were corresponding narrative texts (n = 9), which I called story panels, that accompanied each photograph and those data were the genesis of the autoethnography proper. Those narrative texts were based on personal memories, journals, family snapshots, and other artifacts. Secondary data included retrospective field texts (Burke, 2007; Ellis, 2004) in the form of my reflexive journaling during a one-year period that encompassed pre- and post-exhibit activity; I referred to those as my personal field notes. Thus, my field notes were combined with the narrative panel texts and framed within a three-dimensional space approach, which included continuity of time, social interaction, and situation of place (Clandinin & Connelly, 2000; Creswell, 2007; Ollerenshaw & Creswell, 2002), in order to write my autoethnography. Additional family snapshots, documents, personal journals, memos, and artifacts not contained within the 4
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies Special Issue ­ January 2013 Wunderkammers became tertiary data sources. The three data sources therefore, created a triangle of validation, referred to by some scholars as qualitative triangulation (Maxwell, 1996; Miles, & Huberman, 1994). Procedure Qualitative Data analysis software was utilized for data manipulation. Specifically, HyperRESEARCH software imported photographic images, narrative text panels, and my transcribed field notes for analysis. Thus, I was able to conduct the ethnographic analysis needed to write my autoethnography, as well as the semiotic analysis using Rose's (2007, 2012) critical visual methods. Through inductive open coding, I developed an extensive code manual with definitions to guide subsequent coding processes for the photographs and all texts (i.e., narrative story panels and field notes). I moved from general descriptive codes of data chunks to more focused analytical codes, similar to axial coding used in grounded theory research, which allowed me to recognize recurring ideological themes and patterns within the data. Once my data coding was completed, I used this information as a foundation for developing what Spradley (1979, 1980) called a cultural domain analysis. During the coding process and the domain analysis I employed the traditional ethnographic technique of memoing for both texts and photographs. HyperRESEARCH allowed me to insert memos and codes directly into each photograph undergoing interrogation. Once the cultural domains were identified from the narrative texts, I created concept maps and numerous taxonomies to link the emerging themes and patterns. In turn, following Miles and Huberman's (1994) suggestion for describing and analyzing data within case studies such as mine, I created a time-ordered display known as an event listing. That enabled me to reconstruct the data around the major actors and temporal geographical shifts in order to tell my acculturation story of self-identity. In similar fashion, I used HyperRESEARCH during the semiotic analysis of the photographs for addressing the various modalities found within sites of meaning making. Since photographs played a central role in my research and since this paper's focus concerns semiotic interpretation of those images, I now turn to the visual analysis. 5
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies Special Issue ­ January 2013 Critical Visual Methodology Jewitt and Oyama (2001), along with van Leeuwen (2001), proffered their versions of social semiotic visual analysis based on Roland Barthes' (1972, 1977) notions to unmask multiple layers of meaning within "the syntactic relations between the people, places and things depicted in images" (van Leeuwen and Jewitt, 2001, p. 3). Their use of social semiotic visual analysis resonated with the direction of my research and lent itself to application and structure of Rose's (2007) critical visual methods approach. Similarly, Aiello (2008) used social semiotic visual analysis in her research on constructing European social identity. By combining the framework of social semiotic visual analysis (which I prefer to simply call visual semiotics) with critical visual methodology, I explicated meaning from the multiple layers available in my Wunderkammer exhibit as part of my autoethnography of self-identity. At this point, I will focus on critical visual methodology. Rose (2007) posited a theory for critically analyzing "found visual images" (p. 12) within research method designs that investigate visual culture. Although I professionally crafted my Wunderkammer photographs in the studio, they were not created for the research project under examination, per se. Rather, since they existed as a separate collection of images created for exhibition, they could now be classified as "found" images when used within the context a visual semiotic analysis using the critical visual methodology. Additionally, several of the Wunderkammer photographs contained other "found" images in the form of snapshots from my past. Regardless whether the images are found by or crafted by the researcher, Rose's solid methodological approach to image interpretation is equally applicable to both genres of photographs, which is why I used her method in my analysis. Rose told me (personal communication, December 3, 2010) she was modifying her approach to include researcher created images. However, she began developing her methodology during the last century as a means of teaching students how to critically interpret visual images (see Rose, 1996). During the ensuing years, she refined this theory, resulting with the publication of Visual methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials (2007). Her theory of critical visual methodology (CVM) could be applied in both quantitative and qualitative studies that include, but are not limited to: (a) content analysis, (b) semiology (i.e., semiotics), (c) psychoanalysis, (d) discourse analysis, (e) audience studies, (f) 6
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies Special Issue ­ January 2013 anthropological studies, and (g) photo-elicitation or photo­documentation research. In other words, this methodology can be utilized across broad fields of inquiry. The key feature of this methodology is not only its focus on the image, but also its production and reception by its audience. Therefore, I will summarize the underlying model of her theory. First, at the visual literacy level, the visual consumer needs to consider how images create meaning in order to produce interpretations of visual images, which occurs at three disparate sites of interpretation or meaning making. Rose also suggested within each of the three sites of interpretation for visual images there resides three modalities for image interpretation intertwined therein. A closer look at each of these components is in order and how these three disparate sites of image interpretation are simultaneously imbricated with these different modalities. The sites at which visual image interpretations eventuate are: (a) the site of image production, (b) the site of the image itself, and (c) the viewing site of audiences (Rose, 2007). Furthermore, at each of these interpretive sites, Rose envisioned three modalities concurrently contributing at various levels to understanding visuals: (a) the technological modality, (b) the compositional modality, and (c) the social modality. The technological production of images involves various physical apparatus implementation (i.e., equipment or tools) and their associated technologies. They could range from simple paintbrushes to digital cameras to photo-blogs on the Internet. Compositional modality, on the other hand, references the formal structures of image design, such as color, positive-negative space, implied lines of direction, and so forth. In other words, how the compositional elements are used in the denotation of visual content within the image frame. Finally, social modality concerns "the social, economic, political and institutional practices and relations that produce, saturate and interpret an image" (p. 258). This social modality is the plane where connotation resides, such as social or political ideologies. Rose, therefore, situated each of these modalities within three sites of image interpretation. Figure 2 shows this concept in relation to questions the researcher might ask regarding the interaction of sites and modalities. 7
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies Special Issue ­ January 2013 Figure 2. Image sites and modalities for visual analysis. Adapted from Rose's (2007, 2012) critical visual methodology. Used with permission from Gillian Rose The above information outlines the core of Rose's (2007, 2012) critical visual methodology as I have adapted it for the visual semiotic analysis of my Wunderkammer project. Thus, while broadly using the theoretical lens of Barthes' (1972, 1977) notion of visual semiotics in conjunction with Rose's (2007, 2012) critical visual approach for interpreting the photographic images from my Wunderkammer exhibit, I was able to mine visual information for integration with ethnographic results. By combining these two approaches I developed my visual autoethnography in the spirit of interdisciplinary research. 8
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies Special Issue ­ January 2013 Although I have briefly discussed differing analytical methods for the narrative text and the photographs as a means of combined analyses, I will focus my discussion that follows on the critical visual analysis. This synopsis should provide the reader a general view of how this type of methodology works. Demonstrated CVM Analysis When critically examining photographs, Barrett (2011) suggested the critic begin with description, which means developing a list of facts about the subject matter within the image. That is, description becomes a "data-gathering process" (p. 17). Further, he argued at the base level of description, the critic is establishing a typology of the photograph's subject matter, also known as content. This would be congruent with Barthes' (1977) suggestion that "all images are polysemous" (p.38) due to their content and thus create a complexity for the visual reader when choosing which aspect of the photograph to read and pay attention to and which aspect to ignore. The image's subject is not necessarily the same as its subject matter (Faris-Belt, 2012), and the initial cataloging of the subject matter, therefore, is the starting point for any visual semiotic analysis. Operating at the first level of understanding is the subject matter content, which is simply known as denotation. The subject occurs at a second level of understanding, which is connotative, according to Barthes (1977). Additionally, Rose (2007) claimed, "many semiological [i.e., semiotic] studies therefore tend to concentrate on the image itself as the most important site of its meaning" (p. 76, emphasis in original). At the first level of interpretation of a photograph, the subject matter is addressed in order to develop understanding between signified, signifier, and sign, as typified within semiological studies. Furthermore, within semiotic analysis, the semiologist also needs to interrogate both the compositional and social modalities within the site of the image to fully explicate meaning. Wunderkammer In the original study there were nine photographs within the Wunderkammer series and they were grouped into three sections corresponding to my life stages, (1) First Impressions of my Normal World encompassed my elementary schools years, (2) Passage to Maturity spanned my coming-of-age years and then into graduate school and military service, and (3) Getting 9
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies Special Issue ­ January 2013 Comfortable traced mid-life transitions after career and military service to my current moment. For demonstration purposes, I will direct our attention to the first set of photographs from my analysis: First Impressions of My Normal World. First Impressions The first three Wunderkammers in this series visually depict my elementary school days while growing up in the geographical region of the United States known as the South. In order of appearance at my gallery showing, their titles work in concert with their content: Little League, Scouting, and Space-Age. Temporally, these three images span the years from 1960 until 1966. My age ranged from six to twelve during this period, which began at first grade and up until my first semester of seventh grade at the local junior high school. The Little League and the Scouting photographs contained artifacts and objects that could broadly describe many American Baby Boom boys of that era, regardless of geographic region. Pocketknives and baseball gear, toy airplanes, snapshots of fishing trips and other outdoor Scouting activities, rock and stamp collections populate both photographs; these were popular pursuits for many children across America to engage in during the 1950s and 1960s. Activities such as these and similar ones marked and established American childhood identity (see Figures 3 and 4). Figure 3. Little League Wunderkammer photograph © Terry Ownby 10
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies Special Issue ­ January 2013 Figure 4. Scouting Wunderkammer photograph © Terry Ownby However, the third Wunderkammer titled Space-Age (see Figure 5) presents a different situation. While many American children of the 1960s were exposed through the news by mass media to our nation's race-for-space against the former Soviet Union, only a limited number of children lived close enough to physically engage this scientific and technological endeavor. Those were the children that lived in close proximity to Cape Canaveral and NASA's (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) Launch Operations Center (Ryba, 2008, p. 27) on Merritt Island, Florida; and I was one of those children. Nearly every artifact in this Wunderkammer speaks to America's early space program. The 8"x10" black-and-white glossy photographs are unique in that they are originals taken by NASA and U.S. Air Force photographers and were given to my father because of his job in that particular environment. The group photograph of men standing and kneeling on a rocket launch tarmac includes my father, along with three of the original seven astronauts of Project Mercury (Gordon Cooper [Faith 7], John Glenn [Friendship 7], and Gus Grissom [Liberty Bell 7 and Apollo 1, in which he was killed in an onboard fire]). The collection of three badges in the specimen display case in the upper right corner was my father's, which gave him access to the various rocket launch facilities were he worked. Hand-written papers along the bottom of the photograph were various elementary school assignments I had written, specifically about the space program. 11
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies Special Issue ­ January 2013 Figure 5. Space-Age Wunderkammer photograph © Terry Ownby Thus, these particular artifacts move this specific image out of the ordinary and become extraordinary from other American boys and girls who lived outside the rural Atlantic Coast of east-central Florida. Other artifacts in this particular image are not directly related to the space program, but were objects collected during this timeframe and represent childhood mementos, such as the display case of pop culture trinkets known as Rat Finks, often traded among boys playing on the school yard or during our bus ride to and from school. The upper left corner holds hand-painted clay figurines of American Indians around a campfire (toys passed on from my uncle's childhood) and interspersed throughout the remaining areas of the photograph are other simple childhood toys and good-luck charms. Thus, the above description of photographic content conforms to and establishes the data-gathering process that Barrett (2011) suggested for all visual analyses and critiques. The Analysis Semiology lends itself well to critical visual methods and when considering how we think about visual meaning, can be constructive. Visual semiotics poses three criteria for meaningmaking from photographs: (1) it insists on detailed image analysis, (2) the use of case studies, and (3) usage of unique sophisticated analytical terminology. By using a critical visual methodological approach to visual semiotic analysis, this method provided an excellent 12
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies Special Issue ­ January 2013 means for describing and "understanding how the structure of images produce[d] cultural meaning" (Rose, 2007, p. 106) within my Wunderkammer exhibition. When considering a critical visual methodological approach within this context, as previously stated, there are three critical areas or sites (Rose, 2007, 2012) to consider when analyzing photographs: image production, the image itself, and the audience of the image. Further, Rose stated that in most semiotic analyses emphasis on the image itself was considered most important for making meaning from the photograph. Additionally, since semiotics focuses on the meaning of signs and their interpretation at the connoted level, compositional and social modalities also play an important role in meaning interpretation. However, it is important to give some attention to the sites of image production and the audience, as they do bring some amount of meaning to the images under consideration. Next, I will highlight portions of the analytical process and limit my discussion to generalities and only to images from my childhood experiences, since I explicate these processes in detail elsewhere (Ownby, 2011a). To begin this analysis, therefore, I began with the site of image production. Here, a researcher needs to answer to the best of his or her ability, why the author created the visual work. What was their impetus for image making? In the case of my Wunderkammer series, these photographs did not simply appear nor were they produced as domestic snapshots, but rather, they were meticulously researched, planned, and constructed as part of my scholarly/creative research activities as a tenure-track photography professor at a Midwestern regional state university in the United States. They were also created as part of my personal self-expression as a visual artist in response to life situations, specifically, the death of my father. It was a personal cathartic process. What I am describing here is the social modality within the site of image production. Specifically in this particular modality, the notion of auteur theory, or the intended message of the visual image's author, should offer information about the photograph that will aid in one's understanding and this comes from the author's intentions. However, from within the site of image production, describing how the images were created also addresses the technological modality. For instance, discussing in detail how an image was researched and then crafted in a digital environment within a studio would be sufficient at this point in the analysis. 13
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies Special Issue ­ January 2013 Now I direct attention to the site of the audience. In discussing how viewers of images read photographs differently, Rose (2007, 2012) argued the environmental context of the viewer could alter perceptions based on whether that person was viewing in a formal or informal setting, such as a gallery versus a mass-produced magazine. This is where she situated social modality as being important in how audiences understand photographs. She stated two criteria are influential in audience response to photographs: (1) the social identities of the spectators, and (2) the social performance of spectating. Since this was a gallery exhibit, my spectatorship is viewed from that of art patron and how I reacted to viewing my show at the gallery along with other art patrons on opening night. This is a reflexive exercise that does not rely solely on the photographs themselves, but rather, on supporting documents used in the ethnographic analysis. These were primarily extensive field notes in the form of personal journaling, along with detailed research notes about the design and layout of the gallery space for the exhibition. Here I am addressing the second criteria of social performance of spectating, or viewing. For a visual semiotic analysis, the image in and of its self is the most important consideration (Rose, 2007, 2012). Thus, within the site of the image compositional and social modalities become locations for meaning contestation. Here the Barthesian visual semiotic analytical framework of varying levels of signification using denotation, connotation, and myth (Barthes, 1972), will influence this aspect of semiological understanding in self-identification construction through objects and images. From a compositional modality, for example, each image in the series had common design elements that helped create a cohesive look when hung together in the gallery. Those design elements included the repetitious use of scientific cases to house certain memorable artifacts and these cases were visually arranged on an invisible grid that aligned them with the edges of the photographic frame. On the other hand, items not contained within individual scientific display cases appear within the image area in a more haphazard, random, or casual arrangement. This juxtaposing of grid-like precision and haphazard randomness visually functioned in the social modality as denotation, yet connotatively, this speaks to a diametrical tension created by a trained modernist functioning in a post-modern environment, see Figure 6. 14
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies Special Issue ­ January 2013 Figure 6. Representative photographs depicting social modalities as denotative and connotative constructs for visual semiotic analysis CVM Application What do all these elements communicate to the viewer or reader of the photographs? The answer to that question will vary in complexity based on who is viewing, as each individual will bring their own set of ideological assumptions and experiences to bear based on personal experiences. Since these images were used as data for analysis of my personal construction of self-identity in the form of a visual autoethnography, I am able, therefore, to move the dialectic into "second order levels of signification, or connotation, between signifier and signified" (Ownby, 2011a, p. 138). When considering second order levels of signification, or connotation, between signifier and signified, Chandler (2007) argued the consideration of interpretive codes, such as perceptual codes and ideological codes, would aid in understanding and interpreting the text at hand. Specifically he noted that ideological codes could address multiple "-isms", which included such ideological regimes as "individualism, liberalism, feminism, racism, materialism, capitalism, progressivism, conservatism, socialism, objectivism, and populism" (p. 150). Ideological codes aimed towards racism, conservatism, and militarism, collectively present themselves within the first three Wunderkammers, either explicitly or tacitly. 15
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies Special Issue ­ January 2013 The Scouting Wunderkammer, for example, has primary compositional elements that function denotatively by displaying content specific to the Boy Scouts of America (BSA) and to my childhood activities in its sub-organization known as the Cub Scouts. Thus, this image is comprised of denotative content that I used during my Scouting activities during the 1960s: Scout handbooks, Cub Scout calendar, neckerchief with its slide, first-aid kit, and various collections. However, due to the exacting replicability of photography, these artifacts appear literal when in actuality they function merely as a substitute for reality. In other words, they function as analogons of reality. This was a concern of Barthes (1977) when he stated, "Certainly the image is not the reality but at least it is its perfect analogon and it is exactly this analogical perfection which, to common sense, defines the photograph" (p. 17, emphasis in original). Thus, we come back to Chandler's (2007) notion of ideological codes in that this particular subject content functions as the denotative sign that becomes the connotative signification of the Boy Scouts of America as an ideological apparatus of purveying dominant social attitudes of whiteness, racism, conservatism, militarism, genderism, and national religiosity. To further illustrate the critical visual methodological approach and to explicate ideological connotations found within the Scouting Wunderkammer, I analyzed my 1963 issue of the Boy Scout Handbook (Hillcourt, 1959), which occupied the central compositional and thematic element of the photograph. In this simplified content analysis, which I describe elsewhere (Ownby, 2011a), of the 480 pages of my BSA handbook there was only one depiction of an African American, and that depiction was not of a Scout. On page 478 was an advertisement for Aunt Jamima Pancakes, which depicted the Black mammy that was so readily appropriated in American media stereotyping during the early- to mid-20th century. One other depiction of possibly an "African" appeared far in the background on page 24 where Scouts from around the "world" were depicted as being part of a "brotherhood", which also consisted of French, Arabic, and Indian Sikh boys, all of which were illustrated with Caucasian features. Even though the BSA claims (BSA, 2010) to have integrated African Americans into their organization from its inception in 1911, in the rural South of my childhood no African American Scouts were readily seen or integrated into our dens or troops. During my time as a Scout I was not even aware that African Americans were allowed to participate in the BSA in the South or anywhere else within the United States. As one of the opening pages of my Scout 16
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies Special Issue ­ January 2013 manual states, "Today you are an American boy. Before long you will be an American man. It is important to America and to yourself that you become a citizen of fine character, physically strong, mentally awake, and morally straight" (Hillcourt, 1959, p. 11). To me, being a Scout was normal, it was American, and it was being White. But the BSA of my childhood during the 1960s was not the only ideological institution of Whiteness that informed my self-identity; there was also the church and public school, Little League Baseball, and the early space program in which my father worked. Although two Wunderkammers explicitly address the Little League and the space program within their compositions, the notion of the church is implicitly imbricated with the Scouting organization. It was through the local church that I became involved in Scouting, as the notion of service to God was a tenet of the BSA: "Duty to God--The Scout movement firmly maintains that no boy can grow into the best kind of citizenship without recognizing his obligation to God and gratefully acknowledging His favors and blessings" (Hillcourt, 1959, p. 345, emphasis in original). The BSA manual goes on to devote an additional three full pages to this notion of religiosity, along with describing 10 different religious awards and medals the Scout could earn. Thus from my perspective, the two institutions of Scouting and church, nearly functioned as one. My childhood Baptist church was only a half-mile from my home and was situated in the rural area between Mims and Titusville known as LaGrange. Surrounded by stereotypic lazy Southern views of oak trees laden with Spanish moss, my church sat diagonally across the two-lane Old Dixie Highway from the historic LaGrange Church. That church was built in 1869, which was the oldest Protestant church south of St. Augustine (Brotemarkle, 2004; Manning & Hudson, 1999). It was at my segregated Baptist church that I learned about African Americans being subjugated into White servitude by the God of the Old Testament because of Canaan's sin against his father Ham (Pink, 1950; Simkins, 1957) and thus their subsequent episodes of U.S. slavery and modern day segregation. This story was repeated numerous times during Sunday School lessons, Vacation Bible School classes, and countless sermons from the pulpit. Between the Scouts and the church, I was erroneously convinced that Whites were American, normal, superior, and should dominate African Americans; this portion of my self-identity was fully developed before my 12th birthday. 17
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies Special Issue ­ January 2013 I noted at the beginning of the previous passage that the church as an ideological institution was implicitly connected to the Scouting Wunderkammer: I realize this notion is something many viewers would not necessarily recognize. This is the punctum that Barthes (1980) claimed, "will disturb the studium" (p. 27) of the photograph. The punctum of a photograph is something different to each viewer and it is that visual and emotional element that uniquely speaks to one viewer and not another. As Barthes noted, the studium, which is the cultural connotations of the photograph, is broken or pierced by the punctum, "it is this element which rises from the scene, shoots out of it like an arrow, and pierces me" (p. 26). The punctum of a photograph is individually personal and might only be perceived by one individual and not another. Such is the case of the church being imbricated within the compositional message of this Scouting image; it is something that may only prick my consciousness based on my personal experiential childhood reference to Scouting. In explaining how images and their content affected my self-identity, this notion needed explication. But the church and the BSA are not the only ideological institutions found within the Wunderkammers illustrating my childhood development of identity. Both the Little League and Space-Age Wunderkammers contain compositional and subject matter elements that speak directly to dominant social discourses of that era: my elementary public schools, my Little League baseball team, and America's military-industrial complex of space exploration. For instance, both Wunderkammers depict artifacts from both elementary schools I attended: Bayview Elementary for first grade and Riverview Elementary for second through sixth grades. Both schools were completely segregated during the years I attended, from 1960 until 1966. Additionally, both schools adhered to a policy of MORNING PRAYER and Bible scripture reading, with numerous proclamations regarding segregation of the races and the superiority and purity of the White race. Thus the notion of a White superior identity, both social and personal, was not limited to my encounters at church or with the Scouts, but as illustrated here, it was something that permeated my consciousness through nearly every childhood activity encountered in the South. As with the BSA's purported integration of African Americans within the organization since its inception, so too proclaims the Little League Baseball (LLB) association (Little League 18
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies Special Issue ­ January 2013 Online, 2002). The first Wunderkammer in the series bears the name Little League (see Figure 3) and nearly half of its subject matter is devoted to my childhood artifacts representing my involvement with Little League Baseball. The baseball bat, ball glove, uniform cap (the "O" represented our team name, the Orioles), and the 8"x10" black-and-white glossy team photograph, comprise the LLB artifacts contained within the borders of the image. These denotative baseball contents within the image represent the two years I played in the LLB in Titusville, Florida. Baseball was popular in my hometown, as it was in other communities around the nation, with organized men's leagues going back to at least 1906 for White ball clubs (e.g., The City of Titusville Baseball Club; Manning & Hudson, 1999), and the early 1920s for African Americans (e.g., The Titusville Terriers; Brotemarkle, 2004). However, as with many social activities in the South, these were kept segregated and even by 1964 when I joined the LLB, all our teams were White only. Thus, even my childhood pastime of playing baseball was situated in an arena for ideological contestation; as was the case in 1955 when there was a major rift in the league when an African American YMCA team was allowed to play a White tournament in South Carolina. As a result of the Little League officials from the home office in Pennsylvania ordering the integration of the tournament play, there was a mass exodus of White teams that "formed their own program: Dixie Baseball for Boys" (Little League Online, 2002, p. 7). This Dixie Baseball offshoot still exists today and now is known as Dixie Youth Baseball (DYB, 2010), which serves as an example of commoditization of Dixie (Stanonis, 2008) as a brand statement of Southern culture and racist attitudes. While the Space-Age Wunderkammer (Figure 5) does not contain explicit denotative content that would suggest racism per se, it does contain visual references to White privileging within my father's work context in America's military-industrial complex that was focused on space exploration during the 1960s. But this theme of institutional ideological racial privileging through my father's work experience is not limited to the image of space exploration, as it returns several times implicitly in other Wunderkammers. Specifically however in the SpaceAge Wunderkammer, the large 8"x10" black-and-white photograph of my father and his work colleagues standing on the rocket launch tarmac at Cape Canaveral, depicts only white men. Many of our family's social activities during my childhood years in the South revolved 19
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies Special Issue ­ January 2013 around the men he worked with, which included their families: bowling league tournaments, fishing and swimming at the coastal beaches, and social gatherings for barbecue cookouts. These were White-only activities. My personal impressions were this type of work could only be performed by White men, based on this familial social network and from viewing mass media images of space program technicians working together to launch the astronauts into space. Thus as a child, the scientific and technological work positions in the aerospace industry were privileged, racist, and sexist; something I perceived as being normal. During those years I never saw a women or an African American either working with my father (the only references he ever made to African Americans in the work place were of custodial or food service workers and never did he mention women at his work place during the 1960s) or in mass media images (i.e., TV news broadcasts, newspapers, or NASA films) of his work environment. In my child's mind this type of work was reserved specifically for White men and I personally identified with this concept, realizing that one day I would be a White man myself and some special form of work or job was reserved for me as well. Thus, in the previous paragraphs of this section, I have explicated a critical analysis of three particular photographs of my Wunderkammer series to illustrate the imbricated movement between denotative and connotative relationships. These relationships emerge as Chandler's (2007) notions of underlying ideological codes that had considerable bearing on my selfidentity construction. Therefore, this is the juncture in the analysis where interpretation of ideological codes became important and HyperRESEARCH software was extremely beneficial in their interpretation. As I noted earlier, objects within the photographs were selected and highlighted, thus enabling the qualitative practice of memoing to be accomplished within the photograph proper. The software refers to this as annotations. Additionally, constant comparison between the photographs and the textual data analysis enabled the detection of the embedded ideological codes needing interpretation. For instance, contained within the two photographs previously shown (see Figure 6), ideological codes of racism, conservatism, and militarism presented themselves. The objects contained within the Cub Scout image, when functioning at the second order of signification, spoke directly to racial issues experienced during the height of the American civil rights movement, of which my personal first-hand 20
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies Special Issue ­ January 2013
experience as a cultural insider needed consideration. Thus, we see both compositional and social modalities imbricated simultaneously within the site of the image, as part of the critical visual method.
Conclusion In this paper, I have attempted to highlight applied steps in a visual semiotic analysis using a critical visual methodology, as proffered by Rose (2007, 2012). My purpose was to explain and demonstrate how I applied CVM within my research as I created a visual autoethnography of my personal acculturation journey. As with any methodological approach, there needs to be an overarching framework and here I used the notions of Barthes' (1977) semiological understanding through signification levels of underlying ideologies. Within this framework, I have explored three sites image meaning-making: the image itself, the production of the image, and audience response to the image. Additionally, Rose suggested three modalities within each site for further explication: social, compositional, and technological, which were demonstrated within this write-up. The CVM could be applied directly to image interpretation, but in my research I chose to combine it with traditional ethnographic and autoethnographic techniques for understanding the narrative text. I have assumed the reader to be familiar with these other qualitative methods and focused my discussion instead on the visual component of my research project. Implications from this particular methodological design indicate usefulness not only in photography, but also in allied disciplines such as communication, education, cultural, and media studies. This form of analysis also finds a place in the broader landscape of social or cultural identity.
Aiello, G. (2008). Visions of Europe: The semiotic production of transnational identity in
contemporary European visual discourse (Doctoral dissertation, University of
Washington, 2008). Dissertation Abstracts International. Retrieved June 19, 2009,
Banks, M. (2007). Using visual data in Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies Special Issue ­ January 2013 Barrett, T. (2011). Criticizing photographs: An introduction to understanding images (5th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill. Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies (A. Lavers, Trans.). New York: Hill and Wang. (Original work published 1957) Barthes, R. (1977). Image, music, text (S. Heath, Trans.). New York: Hill and Wang. (Original work published in 1964) Barthes, R. (1980). Camera lucida: Reflections on photography (R. Howard, Trans.). New York: Hill and Wang. (Original work published in 1980) Boy Scouts of America. (2010). About the BSA. Retrieved Sept from Brotemarkle, B. D. (2004). Images of America: Titusville and Mims. Chicago: Arcadia. Burke, D. (2007). An autoethnography of Whiteness. (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from Dissertations and Theses (ProQuest). (AAT 3268278) Cahnmann, M. (2003). The craft, practice, and possibility of poetry in Educational Research. Educational Researcher, 32(3), 29-36. Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Chandler, D. (2007). Semiotics: The basics (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DYB. (2010). About Dixie: Democratic action. Retrieved from aboutdd08.htm Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, (2nd ed., pp. 733-768). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Ellis, C. (2004). The ethnographic I: A methodological novel about autoethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press. Faris-Belt, (2012). The Elements of Photography: Understanding and Creating Sophisticated Images (2nd ed.).. Oxford: Focal Press. Furman, R., Lietz, C., & Langer, C. L. (2006). The research poem in international social work: Innovations in qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(3), 1-8 22
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies Special Issue ­ January 2013 Hillcourt, W. (1959). Boy Scouts handbook: A handbook of training for citizenship through scouting. New Brunswick, NJ: Boy Scouts of America. Jewitt, C., & Oyama, R. (2001). Visual meaning: A social semiotic approach. In T. van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis (pp. 134-156). London: Sage. Langer, C. L., & Furman, R. (2004). Exploring identity and assimilation: Research and interpretive poems. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 5(2), Art. 5. Little League Online. (2002, August 6). 1955 Little League team from Charleston, S.C., to be honored at Little League Baseball World Series. Retrieved from Manning, J. T., & Hudson, R. H. (1999). Images of America: North Brevard County. Chicago: Arcadia. Maxwell, J. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Ollerenshaw, J. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2002). Narrative research: A comparison of two restorying data analysis approaches. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(3), 329-347. doi: 10.1177/10778004008003008 Ownby, T. (2010). Wunderkammer: Specimens views of my postmodern life. Solo Exhibit (invited artist). Gallery 115, Art + Design Center, University of Central Missouri, Warrensburg, MO. Ownby, T. (2011a). Wunderkammers, photographs, and growing up Southern: A visual semiotic analysis of self-identity through autoethnography. (Doctorial dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3454625) Ownby, T. (2011b). Barthes, Wunderkammers, and Photography: The Beginnings of a Visual Autoethnography. PIEA Journal for Photography Education, 2(2). Retrieved from journal/journals/11-2011/ Pink, A. W. (1950). Gleanings in Genesis. Chicago: Moody Press. Pink, S. (2007). Doing visual ethnography (2nd ed.). London: Sage. Poindexter, C. C. (1998). Poetry as data analysis: Honoring the words of research participants. Reflections: Narratives of Professional Helping, 3(4), 22-25. 23
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies Special Issue ­ January 2013 Richardson, L. (2000). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, (2nd ed., pp. 733-768). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Rose, G. (1996). Teaching visualised geographies: Towards a methodology for.... Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 20(3), 281. Retrieved from 1b9d759e-6876-47c2-8dc7979a4cb02856%40sessionmgr14&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3Qtb Gl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=a9h&AN=9701200413 Rose, G. (2007). Visual methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials (2nd ed.). London: Sage. Rose, G. (2012). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials (3rd ed.). London: Sage. Ryba, J. (2008). Kennedy Space Center story: Origins. Retrieved from kennedy/about/history/story/ch1.html Simkins, F. B. (1957). The rising tide of faith. In L.D. Rubin, Jr., & J. J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), The lasting South: Fourteen Southerners look at their home (pp. 84-103). Chicago: Henry Regnery. Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. Orlando, FL: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Stanonis, A. J. (Ed.). (2008). Dixie emporium: Tourism, foodways, and consumer culture in the American South. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press. van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Semiotics and iconography. In T. van Leeuwen and C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis (pp. 92-118). London: Sage. van Leeuwen, T., & Jewitt, C. (2001). Handbook of visual analysis. London: Sage. Wall, S. (2008). Easier said than done: Writing an autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7, 38-53. 24

T Ownby

File: critical-visual-methodology-photographs-and-narrative-text-as.pdf
Title: Critical Visual Methodology
Author: T Ownby
Author: Terry Ownby, PhD
Subject: Article for OJCMT
Published: Wed Jan 23 11:32:05 2013
Pages: 24
File size: 0.72 Mb

Woman hating, 5 pages, 0.18 Mb

THE ASSOCIATION, 1 pages, 1.45 Mb
Copyright © 2018